Look, nobody's denying that living costs in America have gotten rough. But that viral article claiming $140K is the new poverty line? That's some serious number-twisting right there.
The whole argument falls apart when you actually dig into the methodology. Cherry-picked data points and questionable assumptions don't magically turn upper-middle-class income into "struggling to survive" territory. We're talking about household earnings that put you in the top 10% nationally.
Sure, housing markets in SF or NYC are brutal. Student loans bite. Healthcare's expensive. But redefining poverty to include six-figure incomes? That's not economic analysis—that's rage-bait dressed up as research. Real affordability crises deserve better than manufactured outrage built on shaky math.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-26d7f434
· 19h ago
Is $140,000 the new poverty line? Wake up, man, this is just pure traffic code.
View OriginalReply0
SpeakWithHatOn
· 19h ago
Wow, this data is really outrageous. Is 140,000 considered poor? Then what does that make us workers...
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunterX
· 20h ago
Ngl, this data is indeed outrageous; the top 10% pretending to be below the poverty line is really something.
View OriginalReply0
fomo_fighter
· 20h ago
Speaking of which, this data is really outrageous, 140,000 USD is the poverty line? Laughing to death, is this doing math problems or writing a novel?
View OriginalReply0
TommyTeacher1
· 20h ago
$140,000 as the poverty line? This is too ridiculous to be true.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeePhobia
· 20h ago
140k is the poverty line? Dude, how creative can you get?
Look, nobody's denying that living costs in America have gotten rough. But that viral article claiming $140K is the new poverty line? That's some serious number-twisting right there.
The whole argument falls apart when you actually dig into the methodology. Cherry-picked data points and questionable assumptions don't magically turn upper-middle-class income into "struggling to survive" territory. We're talking about household earnings that put you in the top 10% nationally.
Sure, housing markets in SF or NYC are brutal. Student loans bite. Healthcare's expensive. But redefining poverty to include six-figure incomes? That's not economic analysis—that's rage-bait dressed up as research. Real affordability crises deserve better than manufactured outrage built on shaky math.