Recently, the new regulation in the country has confused many people.
To put it simply in one sentence: operations involving the exchange of stablecoins for cash or financing through virtual currencies that involve redemption are now clearly illegal. But if you hold the coins yourself? If the assets are on-chain? This in itself is not a problem. The key point is—once you touch RMB settlement or get involved with the domestic financial system, trouble arises.
Who are the most at risk? Those who use domestic identification for KYC verification, frequently withdraw large amounts from centralized platforms, and directly exchange RMB. These operations are easy to be monitored and may face account issues arising from cross-border regulations.
What should we do?
Overseas accounts + on-chain operations + decentralized withdrawals, this seems to be the most stable long-term strategy at present. Don't put all your eggs in one basket, and make sure the flow of funds isn't too obvious. The market is still there, but the strategies need to be adjusted.
BTC and ETH, as mainstream coins, remain core assets, but security strategies need to keep pace.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
APY追逐者
· 2025-12-03 20:35
Alright, to put it simply, just don't mess with fiat off-ramps—keeping assets on-chain is the real deal.
---
You really need to learn this offshore account combo, or you'll get wrecked sooner or later.
---
Now I understand why those guys keep messing with cold wallets—it's actually scary.
---
So the core is not to leave any traces, got it?
---
Just hold mainstream coins, don't mess with those shady redemption channels.
---
What's absurd is that some people are just realizing this now, should've been doing it a long time ago.
---
How many times have we talked about not putting all your eggs in one basket, and people still fall into the trap.
---
Looks like we have to be even more cautious in the future, but honestly, there's never been any real safety in crypto.
View OriginalReply0
GasOptimizer
· 2025-12-03 14:10
The key issue is the concealment of the capital flow path; this data is too easy to track.
View OriginalReply0
FromTheM78Nebula
· 2025-11-30 21:53
Not a big problem, let's find a way to make a profit first. As long as there are USDT, there's no worry about not being able to withdraw.
View OriginalReply0
PanicSeller
· 2025-11-30 21:42
The RMB Settlement line is indeed stuck, and it feels like the entire ecosystem has to adapt again.
This wave of change came a bit suddenly, but it should have been anticipated.
The overseas account process is indeed cumbersome, but it's much better than being targeted.
Holding coins is not a problem, which makes me feel a bit more at ease.
Large withdrawals still need to be cautious, as frequent operations can easily expose you.
Just lie on-chain, it's simple and straightforward.
You still have to hold Mainstream Tokens, just adjust the strategy and that's it.
I've learned the trick of diversifying withdrawals, taking notes now.
The egg basket theory is always valuable at any time.
View OriginalReply0
0xSleepDeprived
· 2025-11-30 21:41
Damn, we really have to shift our focus overseas now. Those guys in the country still holding on to their identification KYC need to wake up.
View OriginalReply0
HodlTheDoor
· 2025-11-30 21:27
Ah, this... we have to rearrange again, it feels like regulation is coming in waves.
The overseas account issue really needs to be prioritized.
To be honest, the KYC pit should have been avoided long ago, and now we have to be even more careful.
Just keep it on-chain, don't mess around with the deposit trap, those who understand know what to do.
BTC is still BTC, just hold onto it.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationSurvivor
· 2025-11-30 21:25
The overseas account strategy is indeed stable, but it's a bit troublesome.
If I had known earlier, I wouldn't have messed around on domestic platforms.
It seems holding coins is still the safest on-chain.
---
Another round of reshuffling; those who run fast will survive longer.
---
No problem with Mainstream Token, the key is not to be greedy.
---
Diversifying risks should have been thought of earlier; it’s still okay to remedy it now.
---
In short, just don't touch the minefield of RMB settlement.
---
Damn, those who frequently withdraw funds were definitely being watched.
---
Is it safe to just leave it on-chain? If so, that's good; I'm relieved.
---
The overseas account trick should be used early; it's troublesome if it's late.
---
BTC and ETH are still hard assets; the strategy has changed, but the coins haven’t.
---
RMB redemption is directly sentenced to death; now I understand.
Recently, the new regulation in the country has confused many people.
To put it simply in one sentence: operations involving the exchange of stablecoins for cash or financing through virtual currencies that involve redemption are now clearly illegal. But if you hold the coins yourself? If the assets are on-chain? This in itself is not a problem. The key point is—once you touch RMB settlement or get involved with the domestic financial system, trouble arises.
Who are the most at risk? Those who use domestic identification for KYC verification, frequently withdraw large amounts from centralized platforms, and directly exchange RMB. These operations are easy to be monitored and may face account issues arising from cross-border regulations.
What should we do?
Overseas accounts + on-chain operations + decentralized withdrawals, this seems to be the most stable long-term strategy at present. Don't put all your eggs in one basket, and make sure the flow of funds isn't too obvious. The market is still there, but the strategies need to be adjusted.
BTC and ETH, as mainstream coins, remain core assets, but security strategies need to keep pace.