#香港稳定币监管框架 Recently, new regulations on stablecoins have been issued in Hong Kong, and after reading the announcement, I am even more confused.
What is the real intention behind this round of policy adjustments? On the surface, it is said to be about regulating the market, but will it turn into something else in execution? Can existing stablecoin projects pass the review smoothly, or will they all have to be rebuilt from scratch? The market's reaction to this uncertainty may be more intense than the policy itself.
In fact, there is nothing wrong with a reasonable regulatory framework; the problem lies in how the details are defined and the extent to which they are enforced. What is most feared is a brutal tightening that would directly reshuffle the entire crypto ecosystem, and at that time, not only the project parties will be affected, but users will also suffer.
Is there anyone who can interpret the deeper logic behind this new regulation? Or has the industry started preparing countermeasures?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
POAPlectionist
· 8h ago
The policy direction in Hong Kong is aimed at stifling stablecoins without outright saying so, a typical case of ambiguity.
It's another regulatory script; it looks strict but is full of loopholes. Whoever runs first profits.
Before the detailed rules come out, who dares to take action? Just wait and see.
View OriginalReply0
MissedAirdropAgain
· 16h ago
The recent actions in Hong Kong are truly bewildering, and the details have only made things more chaotic; it feels like they are fishing.
View OriginalReply0
TopBuyerForever
· 16h ago
Hong Kong has started playing word games again; who dared to act before the details were clear.
View OriginalReply0
TokenTherapist
· 16h ago
The new regulations in Hong Kong really feel like seeing flowers in the fog; who would dare to act if the details aren’t disclosed?
Wait, can existing projects really land smoothly? It feels like they need to adapt again.
To put it bluntly, it’s uncertainty that kills everything, and it’s more painful than the policies themselves.
Industry pros must have been calculating for a while now; we, being late to the game, can only wait for signals.
This wave is likely to bring drastic changes to the stablecoin sector; let’s see who can survive.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunter
· 16h ago
Before the details are released, everything is虚的. The gas fees have already started to fluctuate, and there are people lying in ambush with arbitrage bots in the mempool.
View OriginalReply0
RektRecorder
· 17h ago
Hong Kong's approach can be described as skating on thin ice; it seems strict but is actually full of grey areas.
It's another political show under the guise of "regulation," and the nightmare will begin when it is truly enforced.
Before the detailed rules come out, who dares to act rashly? Now, basically all projects are betting on the government's patience.
These policymakers do not understand on-chain operations at all, and in the end, it will only lead to a one-size-fits-all solution.
Stablecoins should have had a unified standard a long time ago; what we're afraid of is that this time it will become a new tool to Be Played for Suckers.
#香港稳定币监管框架 Recently, new regulations on stablecoins have been issued in Hong Kong, and after reading the announcement, I am even more confused.
What is the real intention behind this round of policy adjustments? On the surface, it is said to be about regulating the market, but will it turn into something else in execution? Can existing stablecoin projects pass the review smoothly, or will they all have to be rebuilt from scratch? The market's reaction to this uncertainty may be more intense than the policy itself.
In fact, there is nothing wrong with a reasonable regulatory framework; the problem lies in how the details are defined and the extent to which they are enforced. What is most feared is a brutal tightening that would directly reshuffle the entire crypto ecosystem, and at that time, not only the project parties will be affected, but users will also suffer.
Is there anyone who can interpret the deeper logic behind this new regulation? Or has the industry started preparing countermeasures?
$BTC $ETH