Scan to Download Gate App

More Download Options

Don't remind me again today

DecentralizedFinancePlayerPro

2025-11-30 15:20:28

The phrase "send to MetaMask" is understandable, but... it just doesn't sit right with me. Even though it means sending to a Wallet Address, it feels a bit off to express it using the app name.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

FOMOSapien

· 7h ago

I think people say it this way simply because it's easier for everyone... I think they're choosing convenience over accuracy.

View OriginalReply0

token_therapist

· 9h ago

Alright, I've always been stuck on this saying too... In reality, it's just transferring funds to a wallet address. Saying "send to MetaMask" is really ridiculous.

View OriginalReply0

ChainWallflower

· 11-30 21:20

Indeed, saying "send to MetaMask" feels a bit strange... essentially, it's just transferring to a Wallet Address. Using the app name makes it seem less professional, somewhat like confusing the concepts.

View OriginalReply0

BloodInStreets

· 11-30 15:46

This habitual way of speaking is essentially a form of laziness in market perception, as it treats the names of tools as carriers of value... To put it bluntly, it's the best example of carrying the sedan chair; everyone says it, so you say it too, and in the end, those who truly understand become the minority.

View OriginalReply0

DeadTrades_Walking

· 11-30 15:40

Honestly, I was thinking the same thing. It should be "send to the wallet address" instead of "send to MetaMask," and it frustrates me every time. The only reason everyone says it that way is because it's convenient, but it still feels wrong.

View OriginalReply0

NoodlesOrTokens

· 11-30 15:38

Haha, indeed, saying "send to MetaMask" sounds like sending money to an application, but it's actually just a wallet address.

View OriginalReply0

tx_or_didn't_happen

· 11-30 15:35

ngl "Sending to MetaMask" is a way of saying that I totally understand. Referring to it by the app name instead of the wallet address is really vague... when in reality, you're just sending to that address.

View OriginalReply0

MetaverseMigrant

· 11-30 15:31

I totally get the way of saying "send to MetaMask". Technically, it should be "send to Address", but for some reason, it feels like we substitute the app name. Maybe it's because a lot of people choose Wallet, so that's just what we end up saying.

View OriginalReply0

Trending TopicsView More
#JoinGrowthPointsDrawToWiniPhone17
244.34K Popularity
#DecemberMarketOutlook
37.17K Popularity
#PostonSquaretoEarn$50
1.61K Popularity
#LINKETFToLaunch
6.24K Popularity
#SharingMy100xToken
5.6K Popularity

Hot Gate FunView More

1
Bkgbonkguy
MC:$3.63KHolders:2
0.00%
2
KOLKOL
MC:$3.65KHolders:1
0.39%
3
GBTCGarmony BTC
MC:$3.6KHolders:1
0.00%
4
RabbitRabbit
MC:$3.6KHolders:1
0.00%
5
DMDM
MC:$3.96KHolders:5
1.79%

Sitemap