Looking back at the cycles of these years, there is an interesting pattern - after each large-scale regulatory action, the market tends to experience a surge.
Take the first instance for example, in December 2013, five ministries jointly issued a document, officially defining Bitcoin as a virtual commodity.
At that time, the price dropped directly from $1100 to $400, a decline of 65%. To be honest, the term "crypto circle" hadn't even taken shape yet, and the entire market's capital volume was just like that, basically still the 3M game.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
5 Likes
Reward
5
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ChainChef
· 11-30 13:50
nah this pattern's been marinating for too long, feels like we're just seasoning the same old recipe at this point... 2013 crash followed by moon? that's the dish everyone's already memorized lol
Reply0
GateUser-74b10196
· 11-30 13:50
After the regulatory dumping, it actually rose? This trick is really effective!
View OriginalReply0
gas_fee_trauma
· 11-30 13:44
Regulation strikes and then there's a Rebound, I'm tired of this trap haha
View OriginalReply0
OnchainArchaeologist
· 11-30 13:38
Regulatory dumping is instead a buy the dip signal, which belongs to the Reverse Indicator.
Looking back at the cycles of these years, there is an interesting pattern - after each large-scale regulatory action, the market tends to experience a surge.
Take the first instance for example, in December 2013, five ministries jointly issued a document, officially defining Bitcoin as a virtual commodity.
At that time, the price dropped directly from $1100 to $400, a decline of 65%. To be honest, the term "crypto circle" hadn't even taken shape yet, and the entire market's capital volume was just like that, basically still the 3M game.
But guess what happened next?