What does this mean? Many people would say that the downtrend has come 📉. But I don't see it that way - it seems more like a short-squeeze signal.
That's right, the position at 144 is indeed quite pressing, and there have been several attempts to break through during the pullbacks without success. But if you look below, the support line at 130 is not just for show; it has held firm every time there has been a downward probe. The market is in a tug-of-war within this range, which precisely indicates that the bulls and bears are still in contention.
My judgment? Continue to buy on dips, with a target of 152 for now. This kind of rebound after a choppy washout is often stronger than expected.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DAOplomacy
· 12-03 03:24
honestly the 144 resistance is still pretty sus, like yeah the bullish narrative sounds nice but path dependency here matters... stakeholder alignment on whether we even hit 152 is arguably non-trivial rn
Reply0
MetaverseLandlord
· 12-03 00:48
Bear trap again and again, I see you just want to play people for suckers.
View OriginalReply0
OffchainOracle
· 12-01 19:50
Bear trap? It hasn't even broken 144 and you expect a rebound to 152, you're being a bit too optimistic.
View OriginalReply0
OnlyOnMainnet
· 11-30 04:49
Bear trap? Dude, I’m tired of hearing this script. Every time it’s about whipsaw and rebound, and then a big dump shatters the dream. Can 130 really hold steady? Didn’t it break before?
View OriginalReply0
PortfolioAlert
· 11-30 04:49
I agree with the term bear trap signal; the fact that 144 hasn't been broken is the signal, there’s nothing wrong at the bottom.
View OriginalReply0
LayerZeroHero
· 11-30 04:49
Bear trap? Bro, I've heard this kind of talk too many times, every time they say to go long when the price is low, but it always gets smashed through.
View OriginalReply0
SigmaValidator
· 11-30 04:43
Talking about bear traps again, can this wave really rebound? I bet the 130 line won't hold.
View OriginalReply0
OnChain_Detective
· 11-30 04:29
hold up, that 130 support looking real sus to me rn... pattern analysis suggests we've seen this exact setup before rugpulls hit. not financial advice but always dyor, lemme pull the data real quick on those wallet clusters around that level. flagged transactions incoming?
Reply0
GasOptimizer
· 11-30 04:29
Bear trap? The data in the range of 144 to 130 indeed shows no breakthrough signals, and from the perspective of capital efficiency, it is just wearing down. Before going long on dips, one must calculate the cost of hedging.
The MACD of SOL has just formed a death cross.
What does this mean? Many people would say that the downtrend has come 📉. But I don't see it that way - it seems more like a short-squeeze signal.
That's right, the position at 144 is indeed quite pressing, and there have been several attempts to break through during the pullbacks without success. But if you look below, the support line at 130 is not just for show; it has held firm every time there has been a downward probe. The market is in a tug-of-war within this range, which precisely indicates that the bulls and bears are still in contention.
My judgment? Continue to buy on dips, with a target of 152 for now. This kind of rebound after a choppy washout is often stronger than expected.