Scan to Download Gate App
qrCode
More Download Options
Don't remind me again today

#数字货币市场回升 The current market trend has arrived later than expected. But perhaps, we are now just standing at the critical point of a real explosion.



Recently, friends who started positioning at 82268 have been asking the most questions these two days: "Where should I exit when it rebounds?"

98888? Or should we just look at 188888? But there’s a more radical idea - what if there’s no need to rush out at all?

Connecting the recent market clues, one can find an overlooked logic:
After the halving, this wave of market trends is likely to be dragged down by the Federal Reserve's tightening policy.
The so-called "four-year cycle" has never been a hard rule; it essentially reflects the tightening and loosening rhythm of capital.

Last year, everyone was waiting for the main rally in Q4 and the explosion of altcoins, but in October there was a sharp drop, directly plunging the market by -39%. So the question arises: according to traditional cycle theory, 2025, which should enter a "bear market year," will we instead welcome an unexpectedly violent rise?

I tend to think - yes.

Why might the liquidity situation completely reverse next year? Several key signals:

✅ The main funds haven't really entered the market yet.
Currently, the main players supporting the market are spot ETFs and certain coin-based companies. The truly large funds—sovereign wealth funds, pension systems, and national reserves—are mostly still in a wait-and-see mode.

✅ QT ends + interest rate cuts continue
This logic has been mentioned by many people. By looking at historical data, one can see the strong correlation between QT cycles, interest rate levels, and BTC trends. More importantly, the Federal Reserve is likely to undergo a change in leadership next year, and the rate cuts will only become more substantial. Under high debt pressure, the U.S. may even tacitly allow inflation to remain above 2%, effectively diluting the debt in another way.

✅ SLR Rule Adjustment: Undervalued Catalyst
If you have compared the historical adjustments of the supplemental leverage ratio $BTC SLR$ETH with the trends in the cryptocurrency market, you will find a resonant relationship between them. During the last pandemic, the easing of the SLR combined with QE directly pushed BTC up to 69,000. The new round of discussions on SLR reforms may once again release liquidity.

✅ The possibility of QE restarting
Take a look at the recent large-scale investment plan - the scale of investment is comparable to the "Manhattan Project" of the past. This national-level bet will burn money at an astronomical rate.

Revisiting from the perspective of liquidity: This super cycle may have just begun.
2026-2027 is not a contraction period, but rather could be a crazy phase of liquidity overflow.

I choose to verify this judgment with real money. I'm fully loaded.
BTC-5.87%
ETH-7.19%
DOGE-9.71%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
FreeMintervip
· 11-30 03:50
Full Position on this move, either a big profit or we all go down together, I am impressed.
View OriginalReply0
MiningDisasterSurvivorvip
· 11-30 03:50
Full Position? I have experienced the "Manhattan Project" of 2018, and in the end, it still dropped to zero. Are we going to repeat the same story this time?
View OriginalReply0
MemeCoinSavantvip
· 11-30 03:49
nah fr the SLR thesis is actually unhinged... nobody talks about this but the correlation is statistical significance levels of based. p < 0.069 energy tbh
Reply0
YieldChaservip
· 11-30 03:25
Full Position is indeed a bit harsh, but the logic can definitely be connected.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)