Source: BTCHaber
Original Title: CZ's lawyer spoke: “They made him the scapegoat”
Original Link:
Lawyer Defends Founders
Terresa Goody, the lawyer of Changpeng Zhao (CZ), the founder of a major exchange, made some notable comments on a podcast.
When asked if CZ would receive a pardon from US President Trump, lawyer Goody stated: “CZ is actually accused of a certain major exchange failing to implement and maintain anti-money laundering and compliance programs. Frankly, this is a regulatory violation. This is a compliance issue. There is no money laundering issue.” She added: “The problem here is simply that a certain major exchange failed to implement an anti-money laundering program.”
“CZ should not be on trial”
The lawyer emphasized that CZ should not have been prosecuted in the first place. She explained: “He was pardoned because he should not have been prosecuted from the very beginning. The president himself even stated when pardoning him that he did not believe he had committed any crimes and should not have been prosecuted. So he was essentially pardoned for the sake of justice, to achieve justice.”
Goody also argued that CZ is “the only person who has been prosecuted, defrauded, and victimized due to this specific accusation or similar nature of accusations, and has no criminal record.”
Being used as a “scapegoat”
When asked why CZ is treated differently, Goody stated: “I think this is part of the war against cryptocurrency. This process just happens to occur after the FTX collapse.” She continued: “I think he needs to become the target of this war against cryptocurrency. They need to prosecute someone, they really need a 'scapegoat,' and unfortunately, that person and institution are a leading exchange and CZ.”
Relationship with World Liberty Financial
One of the most controversial issues after the pardon is whether there is a “money for pardon” relationship between CZ and the president. It is well known that the decentralized finance project World Liberty Financial is managed by the president's son.
However, CZ's lawyer claims that “there is no evidence” to support this statement: “People keep referring to World Liberty as Trump's company. But I haven't seen anything that proves this is true. I've seen some reports about entities related to Trump holding minority stakes, but I haven't seen any specific evidence that this is Trump's direct company.”
Allegations Regarding Stablecoins
Goody responded to the “implicit payment” allegations based on the USD1 stablecoin on a certain leading exchange network: “Many of these are unreasonable accusations. For example, the stablecoin USDC1 issued by World Liberty on a certain leading exchange network. This is public, transparent, and publicly available information. Many people do this. Just because I posted an ad on Craigslist does not mean I have a special relationship with the former CEO of that site.”
The lawyer argued that people make these assumptions without understanding the basic knowledge of blockchain: “People do not understand how it works, nor do they understand the basic knowledge of how blockchain operates. They do not know how stablecoins work, nor do they know what the business model is.”
She further explained: “It's like saying: you buy wheat from me and pay me in Swiss francs, then I invest the Swiss francs and provide 'money for privileges' to Swiss politicians. Does this make sense? It's saying the same thing here.”
CZ's Future
Goody stated that CZ will not return to a certain leading exchange and pointed out the ongoing restrictions from U.S. regulators: “A certain leading exchange is still under restrictions arising from lawsuits by the Department of Justice (DOJ), the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), FinCEN, and OFAC. This is truly insane. Most companies deal with at most one or two agencies. They are facing five different agencies at the same time: no fraud, no other crimes, but five different agencies.”
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
InscriptionGriller
· 12-02 17:20
Oh, so changing the wording can make it look clean? Compliance issues vs money laundering issues, this terminology is really slippery.
---
Scapegoat? Dude, it's just that the paperwork isn't complete, no need to make it sound so grand.
---
What lawyers do is turn black into gray and gray into white.
---
Failed AML plan ≠ money laundering? This logic might fool Trump, but it won't fool on-chain data.
---
CZ is trying to make a comeback through amnesty again? Life and death in the crypto world is really about who has more power.
---
So, wealthy people's violations are called compliance issues, while a poor person running a small exchange gets the death penalty. This is the reality.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketMonk
· 12-01 15:20
Dude, this statement is a bit ridiculous... just because "no AML plan was implemented" they have to be the scapegoat? How does that logic work?
---
Wait, can compliance issues also become a reason for amnesty? How is that being considered over in the US?
---
The term scapegoat is used quite plainly, implying that someone is taking the fall.
---
Not getting the AML plan right is just called "a compliance issue"... how can this lawyer say it so easily?
---
If they really grant amnesty to CZ, then this whole thing would truly become a joke.
---
So now the logic is "as long as it’s not money laundering, it doesn’t count for anything"?
View OriginalReply0
SleepyValidator
· 11-30 02:03
Well... so you mean it's not illegal, just not following the rules properly, right? This statement feels a bit awkward.
---
The term "scapegoat" really hits home, but how did it get tied to AML?
---
Wait, if there's no money laundering issue, was the previous harsh judgment a bit excessive?
---
With the lawyer saying that, it feels like the whole case has taken a turn. Can a pardon pass?
---
Haha, compliance issues being blown up into money laundering charges does feel a bit unfair, haha.
View OriginalReply0
MetadataExplorer
· 11-30 02:03
Hey, this statement sounds a bit ridiculous. Are they trying to shift the blame when compliance is not done well?
---
The term "scapegoat" is used quite aptly, but is it really that easy to get a clean slate in terms of regulation?
---
Haha, here it comes again. As long as they say "there's no Money Laundering issue," everything's fine?
---
Lawyers have their rhetoric down to a science. Can this issue really be resolved just by talking?
---
Wait, is it really that severe just because AML wasn't handled properly? How non-compliant can this be?
View OriginalReply0
quietly_staking
· 11-30 01:55
Well... to put it bluntly, it's just shifting the blame. If the AML wasn't done well, then it wasn't done well. How can it be called a scapegoat?
---
Regulatory issues ≠ no issues, this lawyer is quite interesting in what he says.
---
Wait, no money laundering issue? Then why were the penalties so severe?
---
Scapegoat? Isn't this just your exchange's fault...
---
This lawyer's argument sounds a bit ridiculous. Isn't the failure of AML the biggest issue?
---
Is the essence of the amnesty controversy that having money and power can turn the situation around?
---
So what is the truth? It's leaving me a bit confused.
View OriginalReply0
GetRichLeek
· 11-30 01:55
Well... to put it bluntly, it's just shifting blame, a typical scapegoat operation. Compliance issues? I don't believe you at all, lawyer sister.
It's even funnier if there's no money laundering, then how were they investigated in the first place? Can on-chain data lie?
I should have seen through this narrative long ago; I should have understood from the day I bought the dip—there's always someone to back up the big shots.
When the amnesty comes, can this coin still rise... I'm asking after being rekt.
View OriginalReply0
PanicSeller69
· 11-30 01:47
Haha, it's time to start spinning stories again, anyway, it's all scapegoats.
---
Regulatory issues are just regulatory issues, no need for those convoluted explanations.
---
Wait, why is this lawyer still shifting blame? Quite interesting.
---
To put it bluntly, they just didn't do their homework, and now they're trying to cover up.
---
Amnesty? Dream on, by this logic anyone can argue.
---
The term scapegoat is used... it's a bit disgusting.
---
Compliance should have been taken seriously long ago; it's too late to regret now.
View OriginalReply0
DeFiVeteran
· 11-30 01:43
The term "scapegoat" is used quite sharply; it's just that AML wasn't done well, so how did it become a money laundering case?
View OriginalReply0
LiquiditySurfer
· 11-30 01:39
Oh dear, the term "scapegoat" is quite clever... Comparing it to TradFi, isn't it common practice to get fined for not doing Compliance properly? Why does the exchange have to bear such a big blame?
It's really the cost of Liquidity, the bigger the scale, the greater the risk... CZ seems to have made a bit of a surfing mistake this time.
A lawyer for the founder of a leading exchange responds to the amnesty controversy: treated as a 'scapegoat'.
Source: BTCHaber Original Title: CZ's lawyer spoke: “They made him the scapegoat” Original Link:
Lawyer Defends Founders
Terresa Goody, the lawyer of Changpeng Zhao (CZ), the founder of a major exchange, made some notable comments on a podcast.
When asked if CZ would receive a pardon from US President Trump, lawyer Goody stated: “CZ is actually accused of a certain major exchange failing to implement and maintain anti-money laundering and compliance programs. Frankly, this is a regulatory violation. This is a compliance issue. There is no money laundering issue.” She added: “The problem here is simply that a certain major exchange failed to implement an anti-money laundering program.”
“CZ should not be on trial”
The lawyer emphasized that CZ should not have been prosecuted in the first place. She explained: “He was pardoned because he should not have been prosecuted from the very beginning. The president himself even stated when pardoning him that he did not believe he had committed any crimes and should not have been prosecuted. So he was essentially pardoned for the sake of justice, to achieve justice.”
Goody also argued that CZ is “the only person who has been prosecuted, defrauded, and victimized due to this specific accusation or similar nature of accusations, and has no criminal record.”
Being used as a “scapegoat”
When asked why CZ is treated differently, Goody stated: “I think this is part of the war against cryptocurrency. This process just happens to occur after the FTX collapse.” She continued: “I think he needs to become the target of this war against cryptocurrency. They need to prosecute someone, they really need a 'scapegoat,' and unfortunately, that person and institution are a leading exchange and CZ.”
Relationship with World Liberty Financial
One of the most controversial issues after the pardon is whether there is a “money for pardon” relationship between CZ and the president. It is well known that the decentralized finance project World Liberty Financial is managed by the president's son.
However, CZ's lawyer claims that “there is no evidence” to support this statement: “People keep referring to World Liberty as Trump's company. But I haven't seen anything that proves this is true. I've seen some reports about entities related to Trump holding minority stakes, but I haven't seen any specific evidence that this is Trump's direct company.”
Allegations Regarding Stablecoins
Goody responded to the “implicit payment” allegations based on the USD1 stablecoin on a certain leading exchange network: “Many of these are unreasonable accusations. For example, the stablecoin USDC1 issued by World Liberty on a certain leading exchange network. This is public, transparent, and publicly available information. Many people do this. Just because I posted an ad on Craigslist does not mean I have a special relationship with the former CEO of that site.”
The lawyer argued that people make these assumptions without understanding the basic knowledge of blockchain: “People do not understand how it works, nor do they understand the basic knowledge of how blockchain operates. They do not know how stablecoins work, nor do they know what the business model is.”
She further explained: “It's like saying: you buy wheat from me and pay me in Swiss francs, then I invest the Swiss francs and provide 'money for privileges' to Swiss politicians. Does this make sense? It's saying the same thing here.”
CZ's Future
Goody stated that CZ will not return to a certain leading exchange and pointed out the ongoing restrictions from U.S. regulators: “A certain leading exchange is still under restrictions arising from lawsuits by the Department of Justice (DOJ), the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), FinCEN, and OFAC. This is truly insane. Most companies deal with at most one or two agencies. They are facing five different agencies at the same time: no fraud, no other crimes, but five different agencies.”