They said that fiat money is here to stay. But here is the uncomfortable truth: China invented it 900 years ago… and almost destroyed the Mongol Empire due to hyperinflation.
Then came Europe in the 17th century. What was the result? Sweden tried it, failed, and returned to silver. The American colonies tested it with variable results. America itself took almost 200 years to truly adopt it.
The change that altered everything
Until 1933, the dollar was convertible to gold. Then FDR said “no”. Nixon finished off the gold standard in 1972, and that was when fiat money exploded globally.
Why did it work this time? Because governments finally understood: if you control the money supply, you control the economy.
What you gain vs what you lose
The good thing about fiat:
No limit on creation (flexibility in crisis)
Cheap to produce
Accepted worldwide
Banks can do QE when they need to.
The dark:
No tangible backing = risk of collapse
Governments can print money out of thin air (guaranteed inflation)
Historically, fiat systems tend to end up broken.
Here comes Bitcoin
Now compare that with crypto:
Similarity:
None has physical backing (in theory).
The differences that matter:
Aspect
Fiat
Crypto
Control
Governments/Central banks
Decentralized (Blockchain)
Offer
Unlimited (can print)
Fixed (Bitcoin = 21M max)
Border
Limited by geography
Without borders
Volatility
Low
High (for now)
Transactions
Reversible
Irreversible
The missing turn
Gold advocates say that “real” money needs tangible backing. Fiat supporters say that gold is volatile (technically they are right). But here comes the interesting part:
Cryptos have a controlled and predictable supply. Fiat does not. Bitcoin is programmable, the dollar is not.
And now what?
The future is not black or white. It is probably gray.
It's not that Bitcoin is going to replace the dollar tomorrow ( the crypto market is 100x smaller and much more volatile ). But the idea behind decentralized P2P money is to explore alternatives, not revolutions.
As long as fiat remains vulnerable to inflation and governments continue to print money without restraint, more people will explore what happens when money is code, not decree.
The real question: Do you want your money to be controlled by a central bank… or by mathematics?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Fiat Money vs Crypto: What is really the future?
The story that no one tells you
They said that fiat money is here to stay. But here is the uncomfortable truth: China invented it 900 years ago… and almost destroyed the Mongol Empire due to hyperinflation.
Then came Europe in the 17th century. What was the result? Sweden tried it, failed, and returned to silver. The American colonies tested it with variable results. America itself took almost 200 years to truly adopt it.
The change that altered everything
Until 1933, the dollar was convertible to gold. Then FDR said “no”. Nixon finished off the gold standard in 1972, and that was when fiat money exploded globally.
Why did it work this time? Because governments finally understood: if you control the money supply, you control the economy.
What you gain vs what you lose
The good thing about fiat:
The dark:
Here comes Bitcoin
Now compare that with crypto:
Similarity: None has physical backing (in theory).
The differences that matter:
The missing turn
Gold advocates say that “real” money needs tangible backing. Fiat supporters say that gold is volatile (technically they are right). But here comes the interesting part:
Cryptos have a controlled and predictable supply. Fiat does not. Bitcoin is programmable, the dollar is not.
And now what?
The future is not black or white. It is probably gray.
It's not that Bitcoin is going to replace the dollar tomorrow ( the crypto market is 100x smaller and much more volatile ). But the idea behind decentralized P2P money is to explore alternatives, not revolutions.
As long as fiat remains vulnerable to inflation and governments continue to print money without restraint, more people will explore what happens when money is code, not decree.
The real question: Do you want your money to be controlled by a central bank… or by mathematics?