LaughingDaysYsxdct

I haven't seen the announcement of the "Structural Act" markup yet, and the window period is already very narrow.

After a night of fluctuation, right before the close, a massive sell-off occurs. This script is set, and that's how it will be.

That’s enough already—it’s time to rest and have a pullback; I’m not just talking about Bitcoin or the US stock market. I mean all of you!

Who came up with this thing called the U.S. stock market? Constantly flipping the V, who do you think can handle that!

Indeed, it’s not yet time to say the trend has reversed.
But at least now there is a possibility of a trend reversal—unlike before, when there was absolutely no such possibility at all.
This possibility is called: the possibility that the 60,000 range could form a base.
Having this possibility is something to thank Michael Saylor and all the Saylors—who kept buying and propping up within this range. The base was bought with real money, not dreamt up or imagined.

1. War has shifted from promoting stabilization through fighting to a process of arguing while negotiating. As long as there is no further escalation (beyond market expectations, such as the first failure to reach an agreement being within market expectations), the impact on the market trend is gradually decreasing. Recently, the war is just an auxiliary reference rather than the main storyline.

When the entire network starts to move into gold, silver, and oil.
Guilin was the first to propose an idea:
The crypto market enters correction first, followed by the US stock market, then gold and silver finally enter correction, and now oil has also entered correction;
Since the crypto market and US stocks have been in correction long enough, they may also be the sectors that exit the trash time ahead of gold, silver, and oil.
I still maintain this judgment.

I have indeed thought carefully about this issue myself. I believe that obsession can be both a good thing and a bad thing.
The good thing is, trading must have obsession; only with obsession can you hold a large position and stick to it.
It is the prerequisite for truly "making big profits."
The market noise is too much, the fluctuations are too large.
Without obsession, you cannot continuously stick to your original correct ideas and plans.

At first, people thought it was just a simple rebound; later, people reluctantly agreed that it was a short-lived rally; after a long time, people finally believed it was a trend reversal.
First, the short-sellers' teachers admitted they were wrong the first time but refused to accept it; then, the short-sellers' teachers admitted they were wrong the second time but still refused to accept it; finally, the short-sellers' teachers stopped speaking.
This then formed the bullish resonance on Twitter.

The power of bullish resonance.

1. Choice is greater than effort;
2. Yesterday, I said gold and silver are dead trash, not as good as the crypto circle, and it turns out they are indeed not as good as the crypto circle;
3. If you went long on gold and silver yesterday, your position is still in consolidation; if you went long on the crypto circle yesterday, you've already caught a big wave;
4. If you shorted gold and silver yesterday, your position is still in consolidation; if you shorted the crypto circle, congratulations, you enjoyed a satisfying profit;
5. Now, let's get serious, $BTC

Gold and silver are now in the “garbage time” phase. Either wait for an extreme level to short, or simply remove them from your watchlist and stop wasting time and energy on them.
Over the weekend, I rode a big BTC move, a wave of some counterfeit coin, and a wave in gold. Only gold ended up with a small loss before I exited; the rest all brought me some profit, and also gave me margin to top up—feels good.
As of now, I only have one position left in support. No matter long or short, everything has already been closed.

About the "Structural Act": Recently, I've seen many people in the English-speaking community mention it, but hardly any in the Chinese-speaking community (maybe due to my information bubble); 1. Time: The Senate Easter recess ended on April 13, and today the Senate resumed normal work; 2. Senate Banking Committee Chairman Tim Scott and key lawmakers (such as Cynthia Lummis, Bill

Actually, in trading, not buying the highs for shorting or buying the lows for going long already puts you ahead of most people, after all, the so-called highs and lows are all preset by us; choosing an asset is the same principle—don't think that an asset has risen too much and go short, or that an asset has fallen too much and go long; instead, look at whether its movement is standard, whether the structure of its movement is standard, smooth, aligns with your trading system, and whether all aspects conform to your entry discipline.

Previously, the four lines of warfare, fiscal matters, policies, and technological forms outlined the factors that will influence future market trends; this week, starting now, in addition to the points above, we need to focus on a new main variable—the US earnings season. In the last earnings season, the US stock market, especially the AI sector, was particularly sensitive to capital expenditures: no matter how much you profit, no matter whether your valuation is reasonable—if capital expenditure is too high, then it’s just one word: sell!

Regarding exchange IPO stocks, just reading Lao Ni's tweet is enough; it's already very clear. The key points:
1. Are they real stocks? No!
2. Can you make money? If the stock rises, you can profit—that's price reflection.
3. Are there genuine stock rights like dividends and voting? No!
4. If they run away, can you seek rights from the exchange? No.

Judging purely from technical indicators and chart patterns, some cryptocurrencies have already broken out of the bear market early. So when it’s bearish, go big; when it’s more bullish, go more on them. This structure is so beautiful—honestly!

Overall, it's still the same view as yesterday: a normal correction after a wave of upward movement, rather than panic selling and a return to a downward trend.
First look at the small support at 70,000, then at the small support at 68, and then at the starting point of this rise at 65-66.
1. Regarding the outcome of this negotiation, it is basically within market expectations;
2. Even if Chuanzi says harsh words, the market is used to it and there are no substantial extraordinary actions.