๐ŸšจAfter the DeFi incident, the industry has chosen to "band together for self-rescue."


Following the rsETH event outbreak, a joint rescue effort led by Aave has pledged a total of $161 million (about 69k ETH) ๐Ÿ’ฐ
The lineup of participants is also quite substantial ๐Ÿ‘‡
๐Ÿ‘‰ Aave founder: 5,000 ETH
๐Ÿ‘‰ EtherFi: 5,000 ETH (proposal)
๐Ÿ‘‰ Lido: up to 2,500 stETH
๐Ÿ‘‰ Golem: 1,000 ETH
๐Ÿ‘‰ And a collective stand from protocols like Mantle, Ethena, LayerZero, and others

๐Ÿ’กWhat do you think about this?
๐Ÿš€ The positive side:
๐Ÿ‘‰ DeFi has for the first time introduced a "systemic self-rescue mechanism"
๐Ÿ‘‰ Projects are no longer fighting alone but are starting to collaborate to manage risks
This indicates the industry is evolving from "fragile individuals" to a "collective."
โš ๏ธ But the issues are also very real:
๐Ÿ‘‰ Essentially, this is "plugging the holes," not solving the underlying vulnerabilities
๐Ÿ‘‰ If similar incidents happen frequently, trust costs will continue to rise
More importantly:
If every time in the future we need to "raise funds to put out fires," can this system truly remain decentralized?

๐Ÿ’กCore point:
๐Ÿ‘‰ DeFi is undergoing a "stress test."
Being able to recover shows resilience;
but frequent incidents indicate structural problems.

One sentence summary:
This is not just a simple positive signal, but a self-rescue exercise for the industryโ€”if it can save once, it may not save the next โš ๏ธ๐Ÿ”ฅ
AAVE-1.28%
ETH-0.32%
STETH-0.32%
View Original
post-image
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 1
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments