A few months ago, before Claude Code appeared, I was using large language models to reverse engineer an old game. At that time, although I managed to achieve some results, the process was really exhausting—requiring manual debugging and repeated testing. As a result, today I ran a loop task with Codex, and the progress within an hour far exceeded what I could achieve in several days before. This kind of efficiency boost is really crazy. Looking back now, the iteration speed of development tools has far exceeded expectations. From requiring a lot of manual intervention to now being so highly automated, the difference is a qualitative leap. This also shows that AI-assisted programming is not just a gimmick; it can significantly shorten development cycles.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
23 Likes
Reward
23
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SadMoneyMeow
· 01-19 23:41
Completing several days' worth of work in one hour, isn't that crazy haha
Feels like this thing is really not just talk, gotta get hands-on quickly
Is Codex really that powerful? I'm still using Claude
The days of manual debugging before, I can never go back
But you still need to understand some tricks yourself, otherwise AI can't save you
View OriginalReply0
MEVSandwichMaker
· 01-19 23:11
An hour's worth of productivity is equivalent to several days. This is not AI marketing hype; this is a real productivity revolution.
View OriginalReply0
SelfCustodyBro
· 01-18 22:32
An hour equals several days; this speed is indeed top-notch. But to be honest, once you're used to automation, you can't go back—it's a bit addictive.
View OriginalReply0
MonkeySeeMonkeyDo
· 01-18 01:59
An hour's worth of work in a few days—who can handle that? Codex this time is truly unbeatable.
View OriginalReply0
DogeBachelor
· 01-17 02:12
How many days can one hour top? This progress is really outrageous. I feel like I need to completely change my way of working.
View OriginalReply0
GasOptimizer
· 01-17 02:12
An hour's work is worth several days' worth of effort, this is just ridiculous.
View OriginalReply0
RektCoaster
· 01-17 02:12
One hour ahead of a few days ago, the efficiency is really terrible. If this continues, manual debugging will lead to unemployment.
View OriginalReply0
HodlOrRegret
· 01-17 02:06
Completing several days' worth of work in one hour, this progress bar is indeed a bit exaggerated.
View OriginalReply0
GweiTooHigh
· 01-17 02:05
How many days is one hour equivalent to? Isn't this just a trap for me? I'm still manually debugging over here.
View OriginalReply0
retroactive_airdrop
· 01-17 01:52
Really, the tools are so useful now that I can't believe it—what used to take several days can be done in just one hour.
A few months ago, before Claude Code appeared, I was using large language models to reverse engineer an old game. At that time, although I managed to achieve some results, the process was really exhausting—requiring manual debugging and repeated testing. As a result, today I ran a loop task with Codex, and the progress within an hour far exceeded what I could achieve in several days before. This kind of efficiency boost is really crazy. Looking back now, the iteration speed of development tools has far exceeded expectations. From requiring a lot of manual intervention to now being so highly automated, the difference is a qualitative leap. This also shows that AI-assisted programming is not just a gimmick; it can significantly shorten development cycles.