2026-01-16 03:22:07

The timing of the sell-off ahead of bonding seems counterintuitive for a project that's already differentiated itself in the market. Given that this token stands out among peer projects as one of the few with solid independent development backing, dumping before a major milestone like bonding raises some red flags. Why capitulate now when the bond launch could be the catalyst that validates all the groundwork? It's worth questioning whether early exit pressure is undermining what could be a genuine value play in the current cycle.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GateUser-74b10196

· 01-19 02:28

Pre-sale before binding? Buddy, that logic doesn't quite add up. Why would a good project need to run away...

View OriginalReply0

MiningDisasterSurvivor

· 01-16 04:32

Another story of "solid development support," I'm already tired of hearing it. In 2018, OmiseGO, EOS, TRON—weren't they all hyped up extravagantly? The sellers, they saw through it long ago...

View OriginalReply0

Hash_Bandit

· 01-16 03:52

nah fr, this dump right before staking doesn't add up... solid dev support, real fundamentals, and ppl are just paperhanding before the catalyst? bruh

Reply0

LiquidationWatcher

· 01-16 03:52

Pre-sale before binding? Buddy, isn't that shooting yourself in the foot... Good projects are just let go, and when the catalyst arrives, you'll only regret it.

View OriginalReply0

TheMemefather

· 01-16 03:41

Started running the night before binding? Bro, this pace doesn't seem right...

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHarvester