If you've created content on other platforms, you should know a reality.

Many times, it's not that your writing isn't good enough, but that the system simply doesn't care about quality.
Cheaters get rewards, farmers get incentives, and genuine content creators are instead drowned out.
So I pay more attention to a signal: whether the project is actively cleaning up the system.
@RallyOnChain's recent actions are very straightforward.
Manually banning low-quality accounts, combined with a new recommendation mechanism to limit self-looping.
Plus the Minimum Sorsa Score, putting the threshold upfront.
This isn't just simple optimization; it's an attitude issue.
It clearly tells everyone that this is not a place to compete on quantity.
You either produce valuable content, or you won't get allocated any rewards.
This kind of mechanism is beneficial for genuine content creators.
Because the competition shifts from quantity to quality, from flooding screens to judgment.
Many people are still looking for traffic entry points, but Rally is already rebuilding the distribution logic.
When the rules start favoring authentic creators, the outcome has already been written in advance.