Middle East Oil Prices Soar Past $150! Understanding It All: Is Iran's Threat About to Become Reality?

Hot Topics

Selected Stocks Data Center Market Center Capital Flows Simulated Trading

Client

Source: Cailian Press

Cailian Press, March 18 — (Editor: Xiao Xiang) Iran threatens to push oil prices up to $200 per barrel. It may sound exaggerated, but as the energy crisis continues, this outcome seems more likely than the prediction by U.S. President Trump that oil prices will soon fall back to pre-war levels…

The Israel-U.S. joint war against Iran has entered its third week—and has escalated into a conflict covering the entire Middle East—but the global benchmark crude index’s response so far has been surprisingly “calm.”

Currently, Brent crude is trading around $100 per barrel, up about 65% from the beginning of the year. While this price was hard to imagine just a few weeks ago, it remains below last week’s brief peak of nearly $120.

Since the conflict began, about one-fifth of global oil supply (roughly 20 million barrels per day) has been trapped due to the actual closure of the Strait of Hormuz. Oil prices should logically be much higher. This seems to indicate that investors still hold some trust in Trump, betting that the crisis will be quickly resolved and the Strait of Hormuz will reopen soon—whether called “Trump put options,” “TACO trades,” or “buying Trump,” many oil traders appear to be betting that the president can ultimately limit market damage.

“When this all ends, oil prices will fall very, very quickly,” Trump said this Monday.

However, this optimism is increasingly difficult to reconcile with the reality on the ground—whether on the increasingly intense battlefield or in the physical oil markets where supply bottlenecks are spreading.

Overlooked Signals

In fact, physical crude oil markets are sending more and more pressure signals, even though these signals have largely been ignored in the international “paper oil” markets so far.

Despite trade disruptions caused by the Iran conflict, Middle Eastern benchmark prices have surged to record highs, becoming the most expensive crude globally. These benchmark indicators used to price millions of barrels of Middle Eastern crude sold to Asia are soaring, pushing up costs for Asian refiners and forcing them to seek alternatives or further cut production in the coming months.

S&P Global Platts reported that the Dubai crude spot assessment for May loading reached a record $157.66 per barrel on Tuesday, surpassing the 2008 high of $147.50 set during Brent futures.

This caused the Dubai crude premium over swaps to reach $60.82 per barrel, compared to an average premium of just 90 cents in February.

Meanwhile, Oman crude futures hit a record $152.58 per barrel on Tuesday, with a premium over Dubai swaps of $55.74 per barrel, compared to an average of just 75 cents in February. Oman crude is exported from a terminal outside the Strait of Hormuz.

This surge reflects significant uncertainty in Middle Eastern actual supply following multiple attacks on Oman’s oil terminals and the UAE’s major oil export terminal at Fujairah outside the Strait of Hormuz.

Are Brent and WTI failing to reflect the “real grim situation” in the oil market?

As JPMorgan’s head of commodities Natasha Kaneva pointed out in a recent report on Tuesday, there is a clear disconnect between the international benchmark oil prices and the supply disruptions in the Middle East.

The core issue is that Brent and WTI are benchmarks at both ends of the Atlantic basin, while the current shocks are concentrated in the Middle East. Therefore, these benchmark prices are particularly affected by the relatively loose regional fundamentals—U.S. and European commercial oil inventories are ample early in 2026, and overall Atlantic basin supply is relatively sufficient in the short term.

Additionally, expectations of releasing the U.S. Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR)—and the imminent partial releases—further alleviate the immediate tightness in Brent and WTI markets.

In contrast, Middle Eastern benchmarks like Dubai and Oman more accurately reflect the physical market dislocation. Both are trading above $150 per barrel, highlighting the severity of shortages originating from the Gulf region. These Middle Eastern prices are directly impacted by export disruptions and thus more effectively reflect marginal supply shortages than Atlantic basin prices.

Crucially, trade geography exacerbates this dynamic. Most oil transported through the Strait of Hormuz is headed to Asia—in the pre-conflict period, about 11.2 million barrels per day of crude and 1.4 million barrels of refined products flowed through the strait to Asia.

As a result, physical shortages and soaring prices are concentrated in the Asian markets, which are most dependent on Gulf oil. In fact, early signs of demand destruction have appeared in Asia as product prices surge and spot crude becomes prohibitively expensive.

JPMorgan notes that time effects further reinforce this divergence. The typical voyage from Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries to Asia takes about 10-15 days, while shipments to Europe via the Suez Canal require nearly 25-30 days, and around 35-45 days if rerouted around the Cape of Good Hope. Therefore, disruptions in Gulf flows will impact Asian markets sooner and more intensely, while Brent and WTI prices will have a longer buffer due to excess inventories and slower supply adjustments. The impact on the U.S., with over 13 million barrels per day of production, will be minimal.

JPMorgan believes that the apparent price stability of Brent and WTI in this context should not be taken as evidence of ample global supply. Instead, it reflects temporary buffers created by regional inventory surpluses, benchmark composition, and policy interventions.

In fact, for refiners—especially in Asia—the current crude shortage is a serious problem. About 60% of oil imports in the region depend on the Middle East, and the difficulty in finding substitutes and timely supplies is rapidly intensifying. Pressure has already forced many countries to make painful adjustments. Refiners across Asia are reducing processing rates to conserve dwindling inventories. Some countries have banned exports of refined products as a defensive measure, which could further tighten global markets.

As crude shortages worsen, refined product prices are soaring. Jet fuel prices in Asia are approaching $200 per barrel, close to the $220 high reached earlier this month.

The Crisis Could Spread Further

Ultimately, this crisis is unlikely to be limited to Asia.

Data analytics firm Kpler reports that last year, about three-quarters of Middle Eastern jet fuel exports passing through the Strait of Hormuz—around 379,000 barrels per day—were destined for Europe, but since the war began, no such shipments have gone through the strait.

Unsurprisingly, the Amsterdam-Rotterdam-Antwerp (ARA) jet fuel barge prices have surged to a record $190 per barrel, surpassing the previous peak after the Russia-Ukraine conflict in February 2022.

A comparison with the Russia-Ukraine crisis may be more convincing.

Before the 2022 Russia-Ukraine conflict, Russia supplied about 30% of Europe’s crude oil imports and one-third of its refined product imports. As traders feared losing supply from one of the world’s largest oil producers (Russia’s daily output of about 10 million barrels), Brent crude rose to $130 per barrel after the conflict—though this worst-case scenario never fully materialized.

According to Morgan Stanley, physical disruptions caused by the Iran conflict have already exceeded that concern by more than three times.

Even if the Strait of Hormuz reopens immediately, relief will not be instant. IEA data shows that since the conflict began, about 10 million barrels per day of Middle Eastern production have been shut in. Restoring these flows will take weeks or even months.

Admittedly, the oil market was relatively loose at the start of the Iran conflict, with IEA forecasting a global surplus of about 3.7 million barrels per day. But this excess has been wiped out by the current chaos. Last week, IEA announced a record release of 400 million barrels from member countries’ strategic reserves to buffer the initial shock. However, drawing down inventories cannot replace new oil supplies.

In other words, the supply shock in the oil market is real and may persist.

Once the Strait of Hormuz finally reopens, prices could initially plunge in a relief rally, but given the grim reality of physical markets, traders should think twice before betting on a quick return to normal as promised by Trump…

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments