US airlines lean on demand, fares as Iran war rattles overseas peers

  • Summary

  • Companies

  • US carriers say strong demand is offsetting higher fuel costs

  • Many overseas airlines face reroutings, flight cuts and weaker outlooks

  • Analysts say tight US capacity is helping fare increases stick

CHICAGO, March 20 (Reuters) - U.S. airline chiefs are talking about the U.S.-Israeli war on Iran in a way that many of their counterparts overseas are not — projecting confidence about fares and demand even as fuel ​costs surge and global aviation is disrupted.

For the biggest U.S. carriers, which do not hedge against oil price rises, the shock is showing up mainly in the fuel ‌bill, with jet fuel prices nearly doubling since the conflict began in late February.

The Reuters Iran Briefing newsletter keeps you informed with the latest developments and analysis of the Iran war. Sign up here.

For many airlines in Europe and Asia, it is also disrupting schedules, complicating operations and clouding outlooks even as they raise surcharges or fares.

Major U.S. carriers this week pointed to resilient demand at an industry conference, with United Airlines (UAL.O), opens new tab CEO Scott Kirby saying the revenue environment was “really strong”.

“We have a goal this year to fully offset the increase in fuel prices,” he said on ​Tuesday, adding fares booked over the past week were up 15% to 20% and that airlines could, for now, recover “100%” of the fuel price increase.

United has also trimmed weaker ​flights, such as some midweek, Saturday and overnight services as the airline would rather leave some demand unmet than keep flying routes that lose ⁠money if fuel stays high, Kirby said.

Delta Air Lines (DAL.N), opens new tab also said it has the flexibility to cut capacity if fuel prices stay elevated.

American Airlines (AAL.O), opens new tab and Delta both raised their quarterly revenue ​outlooks this week, despite each flagging a roughly $400 million first-quarter hit from higher fuel prices. Southwest Airlines (LUV.N), opens new tab forecast meaningful margin expansion for the year.

But the strength in U.S. demand is partly flattered by ​an unusually weak comparison base after travel demand last year abruptly froze and bookings plunged when President Donald Trump unveiled sweeping tariffs, prompting most airlines to withdraw their guidance.

Part of the confidence also reflects how tight the U.S. market already was before fuel prices surged. Low-cost carriers had already been trimming routes, grounding aircraft and slowing growth after a prolonged stretch of weak profits.

U.S. airlines plan to add 2.8% more seats in the second quarter of 2026, ​but that includes a 10% capacity cut by ultra-low-cost carriers, according to TD Cowen. That is removing some of the cheapest seats from the market and giving the largest airlines more room ​to raise prices without triggering a broader fare war.

DIFFERENT PRESSURES

Across many airlines in Europe and Asia, the tone has been more cautious.

Germany’s Lufthansa (LHAG.DE), opens new tab said its 2026 outlook was unclear because of geopolitical uncertainty. Hungary’s Wizz Air (WIZZ.L), opens new tab ‌warned the ⁠Middle East conflict would dent net profit in fiscal 2026. Air New Zealand (AIR.NZ), opens new tab suspended its full-year earnings outlook and said it would cut about 5% of flights through early May.

For some of those carriers, the war is not just a fuel story but an operational one. Their networks run closer to the conflict zone, leaving them more exposed to airspace closures, reroutings and demand uncertainty, though Asia-Europe fares have surged in the short term due to the loss of Gulf capacity.

Air France-KLM (AIRF.PA), opens new tab has warned of higher costs and complexity from reroutings. British Airways has extended its temporary reduction in flight schedules across the ​Middle East. Scandinavian airline SAS said it would cancel ​1,000 flights in April.

Analysts are largely backing ⁠the more confident U.S. view. Melius Research said carriers had already pushed through two fare increases of about $10 each way and that the demand environment could support a further 5% to 7% increase.

TD Cowen on Wednesday raised its 2026 earnings estimates for the six largest U.S. carriers, citing resilient ​demand and a stronger-than-expected ability to raise fares to cover higher fuel costs.

LIMITS TO PRICING

While some travelers hurried to book flights earlier ​than usual to avoid higher ⁠fares, U.S. airline executives said booking patterns were largely normal during the March quarter.

Delta executives described the demand strength as a normalization and recovery, rather than fear-driven or urgency-led buying. That confidence could still be tested if the conflict drags on and higher energy costs begin to squeeze household budgets and business spending.

For now, though, demand has held up better at the large U.S. carriers in part because ⁠they rely more ​heavily on premium travelers, corporate accounts and loyalty program members, who are typically slower to cut back when fares rise.

Delta CEO ​Ed Bastian said the U.S. economy has remained healthy at the high end, which he described as Delta’s core customer base, helping sustain demand despite the uncertainty.

Delta said it had seen only a modest decline in Europe-origin bookings since ​the war began, even as U.S. demand for Europe remained strong. “When you got a war in your backyard, people tend to stay home,” Bastian said.

Reporting by Rajesh Kumar Singh; Editing by Jamie Freed

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab

  • Suggested Topics:
  • Middle East
  • Transport Fuels

Share

  • X

  • Facebook

  • Linkedin

  • Email

  • Link

Purchase Licensing Rights

Rajesh Kumar Singh

Thomson Reuters

Rajesh Kumar Singh is the U.S. Aviation Correspondent at Reuters, based in Chicago, where he reports on airlines, aircraft manufacturers, and regulatory developments that shape the global aviation industry. Prior to this role, he covered U.S. manufacturing and trade policy, including the U.S.–China trade wars, where his work delved into the disruption facing American businesses and the strategic responses of major corporations. He began his career with Reuters in India, where he reported on a wide range of issues covering the country’s economic complexities—from its recovery after the global financial crisis to the challenges of inflation and governance.

  • Email

  • X

  • Linkedin

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments