Small-Cap Growth ETFs: SLYG Boasts Higher Yield, While VBK Has Lower Fees

**Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK +1.38%)keeps costs low and has outperformed on total returns recently, while State Street SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF **(SLYG +1.32%)pays a bit more in dividends and features less severe drawdowns.

Both VBK and SLYG aim to capture the performance of U.S. small-cap growth stocks, but they differ in cost, sector exposures, and recent performance. This comparison looks at key metrics, including expenses, yield, risk, and portfolio makeup, to highlight which fund may appeal depending on specific investor priorities.

Snapshot (cost & size)

Metric VBK SLYG
Issuer Vanguard SPDR
Expense ratio 0.05% 0.15%
1-yr return (as of 2026-03-11) 23.0% 18.3%
Dividend yield 0.5% 0.8%
Beta 1.17 1.06
AUM $40.0 billion $4.0 billion

Beta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year monthly returns. The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months.

VBK is more affordable in terms of fees with an expense ratio of 0.05% compared to SLYG’s 0.15%, while SLYG offers a slightly higher dividend yield at 0.8% versus VBK’s 0.5%—a modest advantage for those seeking current income.

Performance & risk comparison

Metric VBK SLYG
Max drawdown (5 y) -38.39% -29.18%
Growth of $1,000 over 5 years $1,097 $1,086

What’s inside

SLYG tracks an S&P index focused on small-cap growth stocks with 339 holdings, balancing its top sector weights between industrials (19%), technology (19%), and healthcare (17%). Its largest positions as of the latest data are Interdigital Inc., CareTrust REIT Inc.(CTRE +1.77%), and Sitime Corp.(SITM +6.43%), each with a weighting of just over 1%. The fund has been around for more than 25 years, offering a long performance track record.

VBK, by contrast, holds 579 stocks—offering broader diversification—and leans more heavily into technology (26%) and industrials (23%), with healthcare at 17%. Its top holdings include **Rocket Lab Corp **(RKLB +2.13%), **Comfort Systems USA Inc **(FIX +2.81%), and **Sandisk Corp **(SNDK +7.83%), each with around 1.2% of assets. There are no unusual features or quirks called out for either ETF.

For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.

What this means for investors

Both Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK) and State Street SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) deliver exposure to small-cap growth stocks. That said, there are some key differences between them.

VBK holds nearly twice as many stocks (579) as SLYG, which gives it greater diversification. As for fees, VBK comes out on top with a lower expense ratio of 0.05%. It has also performed better over the last year, with a 23.0% one-year return, compared to 18.3% for SLYV. Finally, VBK has greater liquidity, with 10x SLYV’s AUM ($40 billion vs. $4 billion).

There are, however, areas where SLYV tops VBK. Yield is one. SLYV has a dividend yield of 0.8%. In addition, SLYV, despite its smaller number of holdings, has a smaller max drawdown over the last five years. The largest drawdown SLVY has experienced is -29.2%, while VBK dropped by 38.4%.

In summary, VBK’s diversification, higher recent returns, lower fees, and larger assets under management may appeal to investors seeking growth at a low cost.

On the other hand, SLYV’s higher yield and lower max drawdown could attract those focused on capital preservation and slightly higher income.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments