Riot Earnings Breakdown: When BTC drops below $74K, miners can't even cover their electricity costs

Author: CryptoSlate

Compiled by: Deep潮 TechFlow

Introduction: Currently, BTC is about $67K, and miners are barely breaking even on electricity costs. However, operational expenses and depreciation keep overall profitability in the red. This article constructs a three-layer cost model using Riot Platforms’ real financial data, thoroughly breaking down the simplified “mining cost” figure—offering direct insights into miner stock valuation and BTC price resistance levels.

It’s cheaper to buy Bitcoin than to mine it, unless your electricity rate is below 7 cents per kWh.

Full Text:

Riot Case Reveals the Three-Tier Profit and Loss Structure of U.S. Miners

Bitcoin mining costs are often simplified to a single number: “Cost to mine one BTC.” In reality, this figure depends on the level at which you evaluate the business.

Electricity costs determine whether to turn on the machines today; operational expenses decide if the mining operation can support the entire company; accounting costs determine whether the business reports a profit in the end.

To clarify these three levels, CryptoSlate built a Bitcoin mining cost model based on fundamental principles, using network difficulty, block rewards, transaction fees, ASIC efficiency, and electricity prices to assess mining economics.

The model then incorporates company-level cost data from Riot Platforms’ public financial filings to show actual economic conditions.

Under current network conditions, the model indicates miners can cover electricity costs but still cannot cover broader operational and accounting expenses.

Riot’s Texas operations reveal that even after a BTC price rebound, the breakeven points for electricity, operations, and full accounting profits remain far apart.

Riot Mining Economics Reveal a Three-Tier Profit and Loss Structure

At the current BTC price of $67,200, Riot has crossed one breakeven point but has not surpassed the other two.

The model is based on current network parameters: Bitcoin difficulty at 145,042,165,424,850; block reward at 3.125 BTC; modern ASIC efficiency around 17-19 J/TH; Texas industrial electricity rate about $0.0667 per kWh. Since current transaction fees average about 0.02 BTC per block, the model ignores fees.

These parameters produce the following results: total network hash rate of 622.95 quintillion hashes per second, approximately 199.34 quintillion hashes needed per BTC, and energy consumption of 969.04 MWh per BTC.

Based on this, the electricity cost to mine one BTC at current prices is $64,635, with an electricity profit of $2,565 per BTC.

Adding approximately $9,809 per BTC in Riot’s non-electricity operational costs from financial filings, operating profit turns negative by $7,243, and total costs increase accordingly. Further adding about $39,687 per BTC in non-cash depreciation reduces accounting profit to negative $46,930.

This clearly shows that for large U.S. miners, “cost to mine one BTC” is not a single figure.

Layer 1: Electricity cost, which determines short-term operational viability.

Layer 2: Including broader operational costs, which determine if self-mining can cover overall business expenses.

Layer 3: Adding depreciation, which determines if book profits align with cash profits.

The model displays these three layers side by side, revealing how much gap remains between them after a market rebound.

Breakeven Ladder Defines the Full Operational Picture

The breakeven ladder provided by the model is more illustrative than any single total cost figure.

• Electricity-only breakeven: $64,635 per BTC.
• Including Riot’s non-electric operational costs: approximately $74,444.
• Including accounting depreciation: $114,130.

Thus, miners can report positive cash flow at the electricity level but still be unprofitable at the operational or accounting level.

I created four price scenarios to illustrate how this ladder functions in practice.

• $49,000 Bear Market Scenario: Riot is negative at all levels: electricity profit -$15,635/BTC, operational profit -$25,443/BTC, accounting profit -$65,130/BTC.

• Current Price of $67,200: Riot just crosses the electricity breakeven point, slightly above the threshold. Electricity profit turns positive, but operational and accounting profits remain negative.

• $80,000 Recovery Scenario: Riot surpasses the operational breakeven, with operational profit of $5,557/BTC, but still reports a loss of $34,130 at the accounting level.

• $126,000 All-Levels Positive: All three levels turn positive simultaneously, with accounting profit reaching $11,870/BTC.

This distinction is meaningful. Riot’s depreciation layer is explicitly non-cash, based on a three-year lifespan, representing accounting amortization—not short-term cash outflow that can be avoided.

However, it remains part of the picture because publicly traded miners cannot survive solely on electricity profits—they need to report earnings, replace equipment, and cover operational costs.

Therefore, the key question for investors, analysts, and management is: which profit line are they actually looking at when assessing miner profitability?

Price Stress Test Before Riot’s Next Halving

We extend the cost model to 2028, before the next halving.

Based on Riot’s latest disclosures, assuming current hash rate of 38.5 EH/s, increasing to 45 EH/s by March 31, 2026, and maintaining that level until the halving.

This model does not reconstruct the entire market but keeps the current BTC economics constant and projects based on Riot’s reported and planned hash rate growth.

It’s a scenario analysis focused on operational leverage, with clear price sensitivity.

Across all four scenarios, the total BTC mined remains about 15,000, with variations in profit structure.

• $49,000 Scenario: Cumulative electricity profit -$239,436,036; operational profit -$389,648,124; accounting profit -$997,428,094.

• $67,200 Scenario: Cumulative electricity profit turns positive at $39,286,667, but operational profit remains negative at -$110,925,420, and accounting profit at -$718,705,391.

• $80,000 Scenario: Operational profit becomes positive at $85,099,338, but accounting profit still negative at -$522,680,632.

• $126,000 Scenario: All three lines turn positive, with cumulative accounting profit of $181,783,343.

Miners can sustain electricity profits over the long term but still cannot cover broader operational costs; they can operate profitably but remain far from accounting profitability. Riot’s case shows the large gap between these states.

In the model, the difference between electricity breakeven and full accounting breakeven is about $49,495 per BTC. This spread helps explain why miners may appear healthy in hash rate management but report tight margins on earnings.

Our cumulative chart does not forecast future difficulty, fees, downtime, peak-shaving income, financing, or new capital expenditures; it assumes current BTC economics remain unchanged and projects based on Riot’s planned hash rate path.

This limitation does not undermine the core message: under unchanged economic assumptions, the next halving’s profitability will largely depend on BTC price.

For Riot, the model shows cumulative accounting profitability only at $126,000, with the critical point at $114,200 in absolute terms.

Implications of Riot’s Case for the U.S. Mining Sector

For U.S. miners, the broader takeaway is straightforward: price alone cannot solve operational issues; miner efficiency and electricity costs remain the primary hurdles.

In sensitivity analysis, we compared three ASIC models: Bitmain S21 (17.5 J/TH), MicroBT M60S (18.5 J/TH), and Antminer S19 Pro (29.5 J/TH), all using Texas industrial electricity rates.

Within this price range, the S19 Pro’s cost per BTC always exceeds that of newer models. The two newer models have similar costs, while the less efficient miner maintains a noticeably higher cost line throughout.

This conclusion is not unique to Riot. Riot’s non-electricity costs and depreciation assumptions are specific to the company; other miners may have different indirect cost bases, lifespan assumptions, peak-shaving revenue structures, or actual electricity mixes. But the three-layer analytical framework remains applicable.

• Layer 1: Electricity cost.
• Layer 2: Operational costs.
• Layer 3: Accounting costs.

Companies that survive during low-price cycles often easily surpass the first layer. Those that grow through compounding during cycles…