Futures
Hundreds of contracts settled in USDT or BTC
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Futures Kickoff
Get prepared for your futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to experience risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Scott proposed a law on crypto market structures: new rules for protection and innovation
Chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, Tim Scott, is moving forward with comprehensive legislation on digital asset frameworks in the U.S. This legislative step marks a turning point for the American crypto industry, as it will determine how the government regulates this rapidly growing sector. The proposed regulatory framework for market structures aims to establish clear regulatory boundaries while maintaining space for technological innovation and retail investor protection.
Consideration of the Market Structure Bill: A Turning Point for the U.S. Crypto Industry
The Senate Banking Committee recently reviewed a comprehensive bill to regulate digital assets, signaling a pivotal moment in Washington’s communication with the crypto community. The new market structure bill is based on several months of consultations with stakeholders and bipartisan negotiations.
By mid-2025, Senate Republicans released their core principles regarding digital asset frameworks. Two draft bills were then prepared for detailed discussion and an expanded industry inquiry was sent out. The current version of the bill represents the most mature attempt to integrate digital assets into U.S. financial legislation, considering the realities of the modern crypto market.
Why Clear Market Structure Norms Have Become a Critical Regulatory Battleground
The legislation on market structures goes far beyond simple compliance requirements. It addresses fundamental questions of classification and jurisdiction: which digital assets should be considered securities and which commodities; which regulator will have authority over each category; how exchanges, brokers, and depositories can operate legally when dealing with different asset classes.
The prolonged lack of legislative clarity forces crypto companies to rely on executive orders, fragmented guidance, and court precedents to define their obligations. According to Chairman Scott, this uncertainty not only hampers development but also pushes innovative projects overseas.
Conversely, clear rules on market structure will open opportunities for institutional investors, promote high-paying jobs, and reduce legal risks that have slowed crypto adoption in the U.S.
Investors, Security, and Competitiveness: The Three Pillars of the New Market Structure
Proponents of the bill emphasize that the new framework will serve not only as an incentive but also as a protective measure. Its main goal is to safeguard retail investors, increase transparency, and strengthen fraud prevention mechanisms.
At the same time, the legislation aims to minimize risks associated with foreign adversaries or organized crime using decentralized systems to launder funds, bypass international sanctions, and carry out cybercrimes. The committee believes it is much safer to implement clear regulatory oversight within the U.S. financial architecture than to allow cryptocurrencies to develop in an unregulated environment.
This comprehensive approach has attracted support from both parties, even amid disagreements over the strictness of certain provisions.
Bipartisan Coalition: The Key to Approving the New Market Structure Law
The committee’s review of the bill was the first serious test of the possibility of gaining genuine bipartisan support. In the Senate, where power is almost evenly split, advancing any significant legislation requires votes from several Democratic senators.
Previous attempts at crypto regulation have shown that bipartisan alliances are achievable, though not guaranteed. A confident committee vote will significantly increase the chances of the bill reaching the Senate floor for debate and becoming law.
A weak or party-line stance could delay the process, especially given rising electoral pressures and competition from foreign markets that actively attract crypto companies with more lenient regulatory regimes.