a16z: Who Decides the Truth? The Institutional Dilemma of Prediction Markets [Plain Language Guide] This article explores the core bottleneck faced by prediction markets: contract settlement disputes. By analyzing failed cases such as the Venezuelan elections, the author proposes combining large language model (LLM) judges with blockchain technology. By pre-locking specific model versions and prompts on-chain, automated settlement can be achieved that is manipulation-resistant, highly transparent, and publicly trustworthy, thereby replacing human voting with conflicts of interest and helping to scale prediction markets. For more details, please see:

View Original
post-image
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
No comments
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)