2026-01-18 19:33:11

A clear shift is currently taking place: the focus of competition in the AI field is no longer on "how large the parameter count is," but rather on whether the "system can truly run stably."

Behind this question are several practical issues—

Can results be consistently and reliably reproduced in production environments? Does it avoid crashing or drifting due to a single input? Can it withstand external audits and constraints, supporting collaboration among multiple intelligent agents?

Looking at some of the recent technical directions of interest, truly promising projects are not about endlessly increasing model parameters, but about building inference, agent collaboration, and evaluation systems into real engineering systems—moving from black boxes to controllable, auditable, and scalable solutions. Even more commendable is the commitment to open source, allowing the community to participate in optimization and validation.

This shift from "parameter competition" to "system reliability" may well be the watershed for future AI applications.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DeFiGrayling

· 01-21 19:30

The era of large parameters has finally passed, and this time the real test is just around the corner. --- A reliable system that runs stably is valuable; projects that only focus on stacking parameters will eventually die. --- I believe that projects doing well in open-source auditing will be able to survive until the end. --- Controllable and auditable, it sounds like putting brakes on AI, but this is exactly what production-level work should do. --- The parameter arms race is completely虚的; the true technological moat still lies in engineering systems. --- If multi-agent collaboration can't be handled, don't boast about being so awesome; it shows nothing. --- Turning a black box into a white box is indeed more difficult, but only then can it truly be commercialized. --- I think those who can坚持 open-source路线 are the real winners of the future. --- Stability > parameter count; I agree with this, everyone who has run in a production environment understands. --- Wait, how will those teams that only pursue large models survive? They need to转向, right?

View OriginalReply0

MetaMisery

· 01-21 19:03

I'm already tired of those who hype up parameter numbers; the truly impressive ones are the ones that can run steadily. Having tinkered in production environments, I understand that a system that crashes with just one input is useless no matter how big it is. Open-source auditing is definitely a point of differentiation; closed-source approaches will eventually fail.

View OriginalReply0

FloorPriceWatcher

· 01-21 17:18

I've been wanting to point this out for a while—the parameter stacking approach is really outdated. Now, stability is the key. --- Making the black box auditable is the truly worthwhile direction to invest in. Open-source routes also add points. --- Running stably in production is the hardest part. What’s the use of large parameters? --- The shift from racing to reliability is a paradigm shift. Finally, someone has seen through it. --- System engineering > crazy parameter stacking. Smart people can see through it. --- Collaboration and auditing of intelligent agents are probably the next bottlenecks. --- Open source + controllability + auditing—only this combo can ensure long-term vitality. --- Small issues like crashes and drift can't be fixed; no matter how large the parameters, it's all in vain.

View OriginalReply0

LuckyBearDrawer

· 01-19 16:23

Honestly, stacking parameters like that should have gone bankrupt long ago. The real competition should be in stability and controllability. Open source is the right path; community validation is more valuable than anything else. This is the correct direction. If you ask me, it's much more practical than those boastful large models. Systematization, auditability... sounds complicated, but it's really about being usable and reliable.

View OriginalReply0

RugPullSurvivor

· 01-18 20:03

Yeah, that's right. The large model arms race should cool down. Stability is the key. --- Stacking parameters is really pointless. Open source + auditable is the way forward. --- In simple terms, it's shifting from burning money to compete in computing power to competing in engineering capabilities. Finally, someone has broken through this barrier. --- Multi-agent collaboration + open source verification is indeed much more reliable than simply pursuing larger parameters. --- Stable operation in production environments is crucial. Right now, many models drift after just two months of running, making them really unusable. --- From black box to controllable and auditable—sounds good, but how many projects will actually dare to implement this in practice? --- Prioritizing reliability is a good idea, but capital still prefers to look at parameters and benchmark scores. It's a bit frustrating.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidatedDreams

· 01-18 19:53

That's right, the large model parameter stacking approach should have been phased out long ago. Merely piling up parameters is really just vanity; if the production environment crashes, everything is pointless. Open source + auditable is the right path; community verification is much more reliable than self-praise.

View OriginalReply0

WinterWarmthCat

· 01-18 19:52

Well said, this is a pragmatic approach. The parameter arms race has long been outdated; only those who stabilize their systems can come out on top. Open source + auditability is indeed a challenging path, but it also serves as a competitive barrier. In a production environment, stability is key—no matter how large the model, it’s useless if it crashes at the first input.

View OriginalReply0

TopBuyerBottomSeller

· 01-18 19:47

Wow, this is the real direction. The old approach of stacking parameters should have been phased out long ago. I'm already tired of the big model arms race. The ones that can truly make money are stability and usability. Open-source ecosystem + auditability—only this combination can last long. Closed-source ones will eventually fail.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeSurvivor

· 01-18 19:37

It should have been like this a long time ago. Stacking parameters is outdated; true competitiveness lies in engineering and stability. --- Open-source collaboration is the future. Black-box models are really not that attractive. --- Production environment stability > flashy parameters. It's a bit late to realize this, but better late than never. --- Auditability and scalability are real skills; otherwise, it's just hype. --- From a parameter arms race to engineering reliability, this shift is indeed profound. --- Tsk, finally someone said it—collaboration among intelligent agents is the next key step. --- I believe in projects that take the open-source route; they truly dare to accept community validation. --- Systems with good stability beat flashy large models; this logic holds. --- It seems domestic giants still need to catch up on audit constraints.

View OriginalReply0