2026-01-16 04:28:30

Stablecoins have become infrastructure, on-chain Bitcoin finance is reshaping DeFi—but what truly drives the next wave? The conversation worth having circles around the real catalysts: institutional adoption curves, protocol innovations, and market structure shifts. Understanding which trends will actually stick versus hype cycles determines where attention belongs. That's where the real growth engines sit in the crypto ecosystem.

BTC-0,9%

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BoredApeResistance

· 3h ago

The idea that stablecoins have become infrastructure is actually a bit of a joke. Whether the next wave can be supported really depends on whether institutions will actually invest real money. Just hype won't cut it.

View OriginalReply0

SmartContractDiver

· 3h ago

People are tired of hearing that stablecoins are infrastructure. The real question is which protocol can survive the next bear market.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropATM

· 3h ago

I'm convinced that stablecoins will be the infrastructure, but will institutions really come? Or is it just another scheme to harvest retail investors?

View OriginalReply0

MeaninglessGwei

· 3h ago

The stablecoin infrastructure is all in place, now it's just a matter of who can truly innovate... The institutional entry curve and market structure are indeed key, not everything can survive the next bear market.

View OriginalReply0

ProofOfNothing

· 3h ago

Stablecoins have become infrastructure, lol. This sounds like everyone playing chess has died.

View OriginalReply0

FadCatcher

· 3h ago

Having stablecoins as infrastructure has long been the way it should be, but the real question is—will institutions really come? Or will we have to wait for the next bull market hype?

View OriginalReply0