Policy shifts often determine the fate of market participants. When regulatory attitudes change, those relying on illegal arbitrage strategies are the first to fall into trouble—because their strategies are essentially bets on the policy environment. In contrast, long strategies tend to be more adaptable during policy reversals because they align more closely with mainstream trends. The underlying logic is simple: going long is about following the trend, while illegal manipulation ultimately cannot withstand a major policy shift. This reminds traders that in times of market upheaval, sticking to fundamentals and policy guidance is more reliable for survival than short-term arbitrage techniques.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GamefiEscapeArtistvip
· 01-18 22:16
Oh, you're absolutely right. All those gray-area arbitrageurs will eventually get caught. --- When policies reverse, you’ll see who’s just swimming naked. Compliance is the right way. --- Long-term policies win; manipulation can’t beat regulation. That’s fate. --- Fundamentals > Arbitrage skills. I agree. I’ve seen too many cases of small gains leading to big losses. --- No wonder last year’s crackdown blew up so many gray industries. --- Going with the trend is always smarter than fighting it. We should have realized this long ago. --- You can’t bet against policies; it’s better to honestly focus on fundamentals. --- So, compliant strategies earn steadily, while violations will eventually get you caught. --- The logic is clear, but when it comes to critical moments, some still can’t resist that quick buck. --- Sticking to mainstream directions really helps you survive longer. That’s a painful lesson.
View OriginalReply0
HypotheticalLiquidatorvip
· 01-17 15:26
When policies suddenly change, those operating in the gray areas of funds instantly face a series of liquidations. This is not new. But the key question is—are the bulls really that stable? When borrowing rates soar, no one can survive well.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCriervip
· 01-16 14:21
Damn, talking about policies again? I already said those who play gray-area arbitrage will eventually get caught. Now look at them.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-7b078580vip
· 01-16 00:30
Data shows that historically, over 80% of arbitrage funds have been cleared out during policy shifts... However, sticking to fundamentals indeed lasts longer, but the issue of miners consuming too much still hasn't been resolved.
View OriginalReply0
RektRecordervip
· 01-16 00:29
Damn, it's that old cliché again... Sounds nice, but have the bulls never had a failed trade? When policies change, everyone has to kneel. Don't pretend you're the only unlucky one just because you're arbitraging.
View OriginalReply0
metaverse_hermitvip
· 01-16 00:08
After playing for so many years, I realize you still have to follow the policies. What happened to the group of people who bet on policies?
View OriginalReply0
CoffeeOnChainvip
· 01-16 00:05
Those playing arbitrage are crying now. I’ve always said that betting on policies like this will eventually backfire.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)