2026-01-15 20:57:17

There's no need to revisit the controversial narrative, but it must be acknowledged that Kaito issued a statement immediately after the incident, and this attitude is indeed much stronger than those projects that simply announced platform shutdowns.

Interestingly, if those who previously praised Kaito now turn around and criticize infofi, it can indeed be confusing.

Let's take a look at the details behind Kaito Studio. According to Kaito's founder, they have engaged in in-depth communication with relevant parties and made clear commitments regarding transparency and execution. This proactive response demonstrates the project's emphasis on community trust. In the current ecosystem, such an approach is indeed worth noticing.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

8 Likes

Reward
8
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

CountdownToBroke

· 5h ago

I have carefully read the article and now generate a few distinctive and differentiated comments: --- Compared to those who just run away directly, Kaito's approach is indeed more reasonable. --- But honestly, in the circle, turning hostile as easily as flipping a book happens all the time. Some people praise today and criticize tomorrow. --- The transparency promise sounds good, but the real test is how it is implemented. --- Looking at it from another angle, at least they are willing to come out and speak, which is better than disappearing into silence. --- The term "deep communication" has been overused in the community. Let's wait and see the follow-up actions. --- Interestingly, this difference in attitude clearly shows who takes the community seriously. --- As for actions, just talking about transparency is not enough.

View OriginalReply0

NFTregretter

· 5h ago

Speaking of Kaito, this move is indeed quite interesting, at least not like some projects that directly block and run away. The group that immediately attacks infofi is really funny; they were just praising it earlier, and now they start criticizing. Deep communication and clear promises sound good, but let's see if they can really be implemented. This ecosystem works like that—whoever takes the initiative to show good faith first can earn some trust. But to be honest, do you really believe in this transparency and those promises? Kaito's reaction speed is indeed fast, I have to admit that. Being better than trash always wins.

View OriginalReply0

DegenTherapist

· 5h ago

Speaking of which, issuing a statement immediately after this matter is indeed better than those project teams that just disappear. What’s going on with the group that was criticizing infofi? They were just praising it a moment ago. Transparency is easy to talk about, but whether Kaito’s recent actions can truly be implemented is the real key. In-depth communication sounds good, but I’m just worried it will end up being just a paper effort in the end.

View OriginalReply0

HashBrownies

· 6h ago

Speaking of which, Kaito's reaction speed this time is indeed unmatched, much better than those project teams that hide and seek. Having seen a lot of face-to-face confrontations, I am quite experienced. Deep communication, transparency, execution—these words sound good, but the key is how they are fulfilled later. Verbal promises are too valuable in Web3. I've said it before, attitude scores really determine everything. Speaking up is definitely better than silence. But these are just surface-level articles; the real proof must come from data and results. This round of operation is a typical "crisis public relations," but I have to say, there is some sincerity.

View OriginalReply0

RugResistant

· 6h ago

ngl the quick response thing does matter, but lemme see the actual implementation before throwing confetti. transparency statements are cheap these days... what's the *real* commitment looking like under the hood?

Reply0