It looks like the InfoFi project is really going to fail.
Nikita's side said they want to ban "applications that reward users for posting on X," but X itself is rewarding users for posting. Are they playing a game of whack-a-mole here? This policy is completely messed up.
I really want to know how those ongoing activities will end. Will all the running campaigns be canceled? This situation is getting a bit awkward.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
20 Likes
Reward
20
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BloodInStreets
· 01-18 18:38
Haha, the ban on the left hand and the reward for the right hand, isn't this just a common operation in the capital market? Cut the leeks and then do it again.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropAnxiety
· 01-18 09:22
This move is really brilliant, shooting oneself in the foot?
---
Nikita's move has even dragged himself in haha
---
If the entire campaign is called off, this wave will truly be a harvest of chives
---
The nested policy, hilarious, no one knows who is controlling whom
---
It's already good that it can run until now; such projects will eventually cool off
---
Now X might also be affected, possibly a joint crash
---
The event hasn't even been announced yet, and it's about to be stopped, truly despairing
---
Policies change day by day, just a game of capital
View OriginalReply0
ColdWalletAnxiety
· 01-17 19:22
Haha, Nikita, that move was absolutely brilliant, hitting oneself in the face.
---
This policy completely contradicts what X has been doing. Who would believe it?
---
The campaign part is now so awkward... no idea how it will end.
---
Playing with nested dolls so skillfully, the rule makers have become the biggest violators.
---
The ongoing activities probably have to wait until the dust settles; the chance of this ending in a dead end is quite high.
---
It's just hilarious—doing what others are banned from, and then turning around to do it oneself. Truly a genius of logic.
---
This round of InfoFi is probably doomed; the entire ecosystem is bound to crash along with it.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainGossiper
· 01-17 05:21
Haha, this is really incredible. Nikita bans this and that, but X ends up doing it himself later.
The campaigns are probably trembling now; this move was really disappointing.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleStalker
· 01-15 20:20
Haha, this level of childish operation, even Nikita can't hold it together anymore.
---
X this move is shooting themselves in the foot; the probability of the campaign completely failing isn't low.
---
The app that was supposed to reward posting restrictions ended up being the one to cause the issue—this logic is truly incredible.
---
InfoFi is probably going to take the blame this time; no one can say how the event will end.
---
Where is the promised policy? Turning around and doing the opposite—this public trust is gone.
---
Waiting online for an official explanation from Nikita. I don't think this is over.
View OriginalReply0
YieldHunter
· 01-15 20:20
ngl the regulatory whiplash here is actually hilarious... nikita says no incentivized posts then x literally does the opposite? if you look at the data on these contradiction patterns, it's basically a rug waiting to happen. infifi's tvl probably already bleeding out as we speak 📊
Reply0
ForkTongue
· 01-15 20:20
Haha, this self-contradiction is just too ridiculous, you're here slapping yourself in the face.
---
Nikita bans this and that, but their own platform turns around and does the same thing... Truly amazing.
---
How awkward must it be for the ongoing campaigns? It feels like they're about to cool off completely.
---
It's incredible how contradictory this is. How did they even come up with this policy?
---
Banning on one hand and rewarding on the other—such double standards are played so smoothly.
---
This decision is really absurd. It seems InfoFi can't hold on anymore.
---
Even the officials don't follow the rules themselves. How can the projects below survive?
---
Doing a whole set of tricks here, hilarious.
View OriginalReply0
SelfSovereignSteve
· 01-15 20:17
Haha, hitting yourself in the face, this move is absolutely brilliant.
---
If the entire campaign is halted, what about those remaining reward pools? Will you eat the losses yourself?
---
The nested policy is truly funny, banning others from doing what you’re doing yourself.
---
InfoFi’s decline was inevitable; this move just accelerated it.
---
Nikita’s move was really clever, first blocking others, then going on top himself, full political correctness.
---
Those still daring to participate in these campaigns are really brave.
---
It's absurd, speaking so grandly, then turning around with a different story—classic double standards.
---
Embarrassing? We’ve already passed the stage of embarrassment; it’s purely a trust crisis.
View OriginalReply0
0xOverleveraged
· 01-15 20:17
Haha, this policy is a slap in the face. Left hand bans, right hand rewards. Who cares who loses?
---
If the entire campaign is stopped, those early participants will be in an awkward position...
---
InfoFi might as well change its name to InfoDie after this round.
---
Nikita's move is indeed outrageous, it feels like they're making things difficult for their own people.
---
But about rewarding X with posts, honestly, it's just to retain users. Nikita's set of rules probably won't hold up either.
---
Right now, I guess a bunch of project teams are watching the follow-up of this matter. The outlook is worrying.
---
A layered shell game, stacking layer after layer, and in the end, it turns into a joke for themselves.
---
Whether this event ends or not, it's a trap. Ending it hurts users; not ending it hurts the rules.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoCross-TalkClub
· 01-15 20:01
Laughing to death, this self-contradictory move is an art form, I give full marks to Nikita for this script.
---
It's another story of "what I say doesn't count," happening every day in the crypto world.
---
Should this campaign go on or not? I bet five dollars it will end without any results.
---
Nested dolls, layer after layer—this is true decentralized policy making.
---
So the question is, who will oversee these people in charge?
---
Looking at this situation, InfoFi might as well be renamed InfoDie.
It looks like the InfoFi project is really going to fail.
Nikita's side said they want to ban "applications that reward users for posting on X," but X itself is rewarding users for posting. Are they playing a game of whack-a-mole here? This policy is completely messed up.
I really want to know how those ongoing activities will end. Will all the running campaigns be canceled? This situation is getting a bit awkward.