Current social media algorithms seem engineered to suppress emerging, substantive information from wider reach. Instead, they're strategically amplifying emotionally charged viral content designed to provoke outrage. This creates a feedback loop where users consume increasingly polarized material, often detached from actual events. The mechanism raises questions about information asymmetry in digital spaces—what gets visibility, what remains hidden, and how algorithmic curation shapes collective understanding. Whether by design or consequence, such systems can fracture public discourse and amplify social tensions across communities. For those tracking digital influence dynamics, this pattern deserves scrutiny.