2026-01-12 23:24:54

After years of exploring in this industry, I’ve stepped on many privacy coin pitfalls—some projects hype themselves to the sky, but small transfers can take forever; others get delisted immediately due to regulatory issues, turning the coins in my wallet into pure paper. These lessons have naturally made me resistant to any new privacy-related projects. Even when I later heard about projects focusing on financial privacy, I only bought a few casually and never paid much attention after putting them into my wallet. My logic is simple: financial transparency is a must for compliance, and privacy and compliance are inherently at odds. Such projects simply can’t last long, let alone have practical applications.

What truly changed my perspective was a real estate tokenization project I took on last year. The client wanted to tokenize commercial real estate shares using blockchain so that small and medium investors could participate. It sounded ideal, but the actual requirements were incredibly complex: they needed to protect investors’ privacy information and holding data from leaks, meet regulatory compliance and filing standards, and most importantly, ensure that the tokenized asset’s value could accurately reflect the real-world property value. This requirement sounds a bit idealistic, but for teams genuinely aiming to standardize RWA, it’s an unavoidable hurdle.

We tested four public chain solutions claiming to focus on privacy or RWA. The result? Either privacy was a sham, with investor data easily exposed; or compliance standards were simply not met; or asset valuation was a complete black box, unable to match real estate values. The whole process dragged on for over two months with no progress. Later, an industry veteran mentioned that I should check out a project focused on financial privacy.

RWA7,19%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

HalfBuddhaMoney

· 4h ago

Privacy and compliance are really a deadlock, this guy's words hit the mark You just can't bear to step into the pit, haha After two months of messing around, there's still no clear answer, this is the real Web3 To put it nicely, it's RWA; to put it bluntly, it's trying to dance in the gray area This demand clearly tests who can truly achieve both fish and bear's paw I've heard too many stories about privacy coins, and every time it's "this time it's different" Financial privacy projects sound impressive, but how many are actually implementable?

View OriginalReply0

TokenRationEater

· 20h ago

Privacy and compliance are truly the century's toughest problems. I've stepped on all the pits this guy has, too. --- The demand for real estate tokenization is indeed excellent. After testing four chains over two months, all of them failed. How despairing must that be. --- Wait, so is the project recommended by that senior veteran reliable? Or is it just another air project? --- Compliance, transparency, and privacy protection—how can a triangle be fully completed? Pick one, buddy. --- What I fear most are these idealistic demands. In reality, RWA isn't that sexy at all. --- I laughed the moment the data was extracted. This is what they call a privacy solution. --- Over two months with no progress. The real question is whether this entire direction is meaningful.

View OriginalReply0

DeFiDoctor

· 01-13 04:08

The medical records show that all four public chain solutions failed to meet clinical performance standards, and privacy compliance complications are really hard to treat.

View OriginalReply0

TopBuyerBottomSeller

· 01-12 23:54

Really? Over two months and four tests all failed, that must be really frustrating. I used to believe that privacy and compliance are inherently at odds, but now I think that view was too absolute. RWA (Real-World Assets) still needs to be grounded in practical needs; armchair theorizing is useless. What happened to that project recommended by the senior expert? Any progress?

View OriginalReply0

GasWastingMaximalist

· 01-12 23:48

Having experienced many pitfalls, I understand that privacy and compliance are truly the century's toughest challenges. I think the tokenization of real estate is a bit overly idealistic... After more than two months of tinkering with four different chains, it's still not resolved, which really says a lot. RWA (Real World Assets) definitely needs to find that balance point; otherwise, it's just a castle in the air. Honestly, none of the many solutions I've tested have worked, so I'm curious about how that veteran's recommendation actually performs.

View OriginalReply0

GetRichLeek

· 01-12 23:35

I've already suffered huge losses before, and now every time I hear about privacy coins, I reflexively want to run. It wasn't until you mentioned it that I realized the real-world needs are much more complex than I thought.

View OriginalReply0

NeonCollector

· 01-12 23:35

Damn, privacy and compliance are really eternal contradictions. So true. Wait, can real estate tokenization be played like this? I haven't quite figured out this logic. After more than two months of pitfalls, well, this is the real Web3 lesson. Compliance black box, data leaks, pricing chaos—four public chains all underperform? That's pretty harsh. What was that project the veteran mentioned? So mysterious. Actually, RWA really gets stuck on privacy. I hadn't realized that before. By the way, can these kinds of projects really break through? It feels more like metaphysics. Two months of effort to gain this understanding—it's somewhat valuable but also a bit heartbreaking. Privacy coins are dead, but the need for privacy isn't dead. How to solve this problem? Regulation makes it dead on arrival, but without regulation, it can't survive either—it's a deadlock.

View OriginalReply0

TokenCreatorOP

· 01-12 23:30

Is this finally a slap in the face, can privacy and compliance really be achieved simultaneously? This wave of RWA is indeed difficult. We've stepped on so many pits before and still dare to trust again, quite brave. Wait, all four public chains are underperforming? How bad does it have to be? I've also experienced a lot of issues with privacy coins. Now I see everything as a scam haha. Tokenization of real estate sounds good, but I'm just worried it will end up as a failed project again. Testing for over two months and only getting silence—who is this legendary veteran? No way, can privacy projects really pass audits now? I haven't heard about it yet. Hopefully, this time I won't just buy and leave it aside. At least I should follow up. The words "compliance" and "transparency" together make the difficulty level skyrocket. I bet five bucks this project, which is "focused on financial privacy," will also crash eventually. The key question is, can investors' money really be protected? That's what really matters. The future of RWA indeed needs such solutions, but can they really do it well?

View OriginalReply0