The Lighter project essentially embodies the core logic of shorting Hyperliquid—issues like farm token models and unsustainable revenue sources. Interestingly, there are voices in the market supporting Hyperliquid, and as a result, this wave of popularity has actually boosted Lighter's visibility, with many participants jumping in to mine in a follow-the-leader fashion. This reflects a phenomenon: opposing project evaluations often generate mutual traffic, and the pursuit behavior of capital and users can sometimes resemble a reverse conspiracy.

LIT-19.58%
HYPE-1.92%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
NFTregrettervip
· 3h ago
This wave of reverse collusion is quite brilliant, the real winners might be the market makers haha --- So the lifespan of farm tokens isn't long, better not to be too greedy --- That's why I never choose sides; digging on both ends is the real strategy --- The tactic of opposing projects bleeding each other is old, but indeed effective --- Creating conflicts to generate buzz, harvesting the hype with bagholders, cycle repeats --- Hyperliquid and Lighter are just two dogs fighting for traffic, we just watch the show --- It's hilarious, the more people hype it up, the higher the buzz, and when the buzz is high, people follow the trend to enter, most of those entering are the final bagholders
View OriginalReply0
TheMemefathervip
· 7h ago
Farm coin is the number one in harvesting profits; both sides praise each other and the price keeps rising. This deal is absolutely brilliant.
View OriginalReply0
BridgeJumpervip
· 7h ago
Damn, this is exactly what I was talking about—two projects riding each other's coattails, and retail investors get completely wrecked --- Aren't farm coins all like this? Early crazy mining, then they go to zero later. Lighter and Hyperliquid use the same套路 --- Reverse collusion, well said. Capital earns traffic, users get the thrill of getting wrecked, a perfect closed loop --- By the way, does anyone really believe these projects can sustain profits? I don't believe it anyway --- Is that all? I thought Lighter could come up with something new, but it's still the same old tokenomics --- Capital and users mutually achieve each other—you're wrecking me, I'm wrecking you, everyone’s happy --- Hmm... so now everyone entering Lighter is betting that this wave of hype can be pumped up a bit longer --- Creating traffic through opposing viewpoints—this move is indeed brilliant, full marks for marketing --- Feels like this is the only trick in the crypto world, I'm tired of it --- Wait, isn't the voice supporting Hyperliquid actually the puppet master behind Lighter? Think about it carefully, it's chilling
View OriginalReply0
BTCRetirementFundvip
· 7h ago
This trick is really clever; stepping on each other actually makes both sides popular—a double act of harvesting the little guys.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropworkerZhangvip
· 7h ago
This strategy is all about mutual blood transfusion; winning or losing doesn't matter. Anyway, we're really making a profit from mining.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)