There's been questions about whether the administration pressured DOJ to investigate Fed Chair Powell. The answer is straightforward—no such directive was given. As for the president's repeated public criticism of the Fed chair's policies, that's within his right to do. Presidents have long voiced views on monetary policy and central bank decisions. The distinction between voicing political opinion and exercising improper government influence is an important one worth understanding, especially as markets react to shifting relationships between executive and monetary policy branches.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
VitalikFanboy42
· 8h ago
Uh, basically it's the kind of talk that says "we're not under pressure anymore"... Alright, I'll trust you this once, but the distinction is way too blurry.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-4745f9ce
· 8h ago
It sounds like you're just making excuses for someone, saying there's no pressure but also claiming the right to criticize... Why does this logic feel so familiar?
View OriginalReply0
ser_aped.eth
· 8h ago
Hey, this way of saying sounds a bit... you know what I mean? Saying there's no pressure when there actually is?
View OriginalReply0
TokenStorm
· 8h ago
Ha, it's that same excuse of "I didn't pressure anyone"... The on-chain data, however, is honest and won't lie.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainRetirementHome
· 9h ago
Ah, it's the same old spiel again, "No pressure" is enough? The market will just listen and move on, let's look at the data to speak for itself.
There's been questions about whether the administration pressured DOJ to investigate Fed Chair Powell. The answer is straightforward—no such directive was given. As for the president's repeated public criticism of the Fed chair's policies, that's within his right to do. Presidents have long voiced views on monetary policy and central bank decisions. The distinction between voicing political opinion and exercising improper government influence is an important one worth understanding, especially as markets react to shifting relationships between executive and monetary policy branches.