There's a weird contradiction in how some people think about engagement metrics. The whole 'you need followers to matter' mentality sounds logical until you realize most platforms are already showing content independent of who you follow. So here's the question: if the algorithm isn't even using your follower count to distribute your posts, why would anyone feel pressured to chase followers in the first place? The logic just doesn't hold up. Worth reconsidering what actually drives visibility in decentralized social ecosystems.

DESO2.26%
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MetaverseMigrantvip
· 7h ago
Honestly, the fan count strategy has long been outdated; the algorithm doesn't pay attention to this at all.
View OriginalReply0
MrRightClickvip
· 7h ago
Even without considering follower counts, still obsessively buying followers—this mindset is truly hopeless.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainArchaeologistvip
· 7h ago
Algorithms have long stopped considering follower count, and those still competing for followers are truly brainwashed.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-0717ab66vip
· 7h ago
Basically, the platforms are just scamming us by piling up followers.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • بالعربية
  • Português (Brasil)
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Español
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Русский
  • 繁體中文
  • Українська
  • Tiếng Việt