2026-01-12 22:24:41

A project has put a lot of effort into the L1 layer. Their self-developed Piecrust virtual machine follows a ZK-friendly technical route, focusing on the combination of privacy and performance — running smart contracts on the blockchain that are both fast and private. This is indeed attractive to institutions looking to enter the space.

Honestly, building a privacy-first L1 from scratch is technically challenging. But looking at their technology stack design, from the underlying virtual machine to the upper-layer applications, the approach is quite clear. This is not just for the hype this year, but to prepare for long-term ecosystem development. Privacy computing, high-efficiency execution, and compatibility with institutional finance — whether these three can truly be integrated remains to be seen based on the actual deployment results.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SandwichVictim

· 01-12 22:46

It's quite loud, but whether Piecrust can stay stable when it really runs is still a question... The ZK path isn't that easy to walk.

View OriginalReply0

SchrodingerAirdrop

· 01-12 22:42

Privacy + performance is a good combination, but how many can actually implement it? Piecrust looks very clear, but I'm worried that in the end, it's just another old routine where PPT is better than the code.

View OriginalReply0

SatsStacking

· 01-12 22:41

Piecrust really seems to have put in effort. The ZK-friendly approach is not just a gimmick; actually achieving the combination of privacy and high performance is not that easy.

View OriginalReply0

RugpullTherapist

· 01-12 22:36

A combination of privacy + performance sounds quite appealing, but the real key is whether Piecrust can actually be implemented successfully without issues.

View OriginalReply0

LootboxPhobia

· 01-12 22:36

Piecrust sounds good, but I still have some doubts about whether it can really run. Privacy plus performance in one package sounds tough; ZK is friendly but not a silver bullet. Institutions, don't rush to get involved. Let's wait until they deploy their solutions.

View OriginalReply0

Rugpull幸存者

· 01-12 22:32

Looking at Piecrust, this set of tools, it’s indeed somewhat interesting, but I still want to wait and see. Is the Piecrust virtual machine really stable? It feels like the ZK path is not without pitfalls. The combination of privacy + performance sounds tempting, but I’m worried it might just be on paper. Let’s wait and see the deployment results. I’m used to these foundational projects being hyped up. A clear technical roadmap doesn’t necessarily mean it can actually run; many projects have failed. The three-in-one integration? Let’s prove it can run stably first, don’t want another PPT coin.

View OriginalReply0