2026-01-12 22:21:47

Is it possible to achieve both privacy protection and compliant issuance at the same time? Dusk provides its answer. This project focuses on building open, private financial infrastructure, with the core approach of integrating privacy protection into blockchain technology itself. Their modular solutions cover multiple scenarios such as compliant asset issuance and decentralized applications. In simple terms, it allows you to control your digital identity and financial data without having to choose between transparency and privacy.

From the foundation's recent activities, continuous technological research and ecosystem development are underway. The goal is quite clear—redefining the boundaries of trust in the digital age, opening up new possibilities for value exchange in the next-generation internet. This approach of balancing privacy protection and openness is still meaningful for the entire Web3 ecosystem.

DUSK20,89%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BlockchainNewbie

· 10h ago

Can privacy and compliance truly be achieved at the same time? It feels like just a pie in the sky. Let's see it truly implemented first.

View OriginalReply0

ser_we_are_early

· 10h ago

Can privacy and compliance really be achieved simultaneously? Dusk's approach does have some merit, but whether this solution can be truly implemented depends on its subsequent technical performance.

View OriginalReply0

GasGuzzler

· 10h ago

Can privacy and compliance really go hand in hand? This is the right path for Web3, and finally someone is taking this seriously.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoHistoryClass

· 10h ago

ah yes, the classic "have your cake and eat it too" pitch. statistically speaking, every project claiming to solve the privacy-compliance paradox has followed the exact same trajectory as... well, let me check the charts from 2017-2018. the similarity is uncanny, ngl.

Reply0

WalletAnxietyPatient

· 10h ago

Can privacy and compliance truly coexist? It sounds ideal, but I'm worried it might just be another PPT project.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityNinja

· 10h ago

Can privacy and compliance truly be both achieved simultaneously? It doesn't seem that simple.

View OriginalReply0

MidnightMEVeater

· 10h ago

Good morning, night creatures. You're still watching this at 3 a.m.? Handling privacy and compliance at the same time sounds like empty promises before a sandwich attack. Wake up, everyone. Isn't it always a choice between two options, which eventually turns into a zero-sum game? Really good at storytelling, huh? Modular solutions cure all diseases, and in arbitrage zones, they love this kind of narrative about the big pie. When someone finally rolls up their sleeves and starts using it, gas wars and price shocks will hit together. Redefining trust boundaries? Ha, every new project says that. The question is, who defines it, and how are miner tips calculated? Privacy infrastructure sounds high-level, but in reality, isn't it just playing tai chi between dark pool trading and on-chain transparency? It's always the foundation pushing forward, or ecosystem building. When will we see real applications with actual funds? Other projects say the same. Before we continue, let me ask: have you calculated the time cost of entering and exiting this system? The liquidity trap is just waiting for you. This phrase "modular coverage of multiple scenarios" looks like a PowerPoint slide; the product is nowhere to be seen. Web3 loves this—first talking about how human weaknesses are designed, then packaging it as the next-generation internet savior. It's just a cycle show.

View OriginalReply0