A feedback loop that actually works—imagine letting users rate campaigns the way they'd review anything else. Stars, quick thoughts, the whole deal. What clicked, what flopped, what could've been better. Both sides win here: projects get candid insights to level up their game, and the platform itself gets a built-in quality meter. It's the kind of transparency that weeds out the noise and helps decent projects stand out. Real feedback tends to separate the wheat from the chaff pretty quick.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
CryptoPunstervip
· 9h ago
Another "User Rating System" genius plan, sounds really good, but I wonder if the project team will actually listen to feedback or just continue to cut leeks haha
View OriginalReply0
pumpamentalistvip
· 9h ago
ngl, this feedback mechanism sounds good, but I'm worried it will end up being just a game of mutual praise again.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerAirdropvip
· 9h ago
To be honest, this rating system sounds good in theory but mostly collapses in execution. Trash projects can still rack up high scores.
View OriginalReply0
FlatlineTradervip
· 10h ago
The genuine feedback system is good, just worried it might end up as a shouting match at the end.
View OriginalReply0
rekt_but_resilientvip
· 10h ago
NGL, this scoring system should have been implemented long ago. I'm just worried that truly garbage projects will still find ways to raise funds.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)