A prominent Republican lawmaker on the House Financial Services Committee has pushed back against ongoing investigations into the Federal Reserve Chair, arguing the probe diverts attention from pressing economic priorities. The criticism highlights growing tensions within Congress over how to balance regulatory oversight with maintaining policy continuity. Market observers note that political uncertainty surrounding key financial institutions can create volatility in crypto and traditional markets, making regulatory clarity increasingly important for investors managing positions during this period.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MerkleDreamervip
· 12h ago
They're fighting among themselves again. When will these people focus on solving real problems...
View OriginalReply0
ChainBrainvip
· 12h ago
Here we go again with this? Congress is bickering every day, and we in the crypto world have to suffer...
View OriginalReply0
MeltdownSurvivalistvip
· 12h ago
Here we go again, politicians passing the buck to each other... With the Fed causing such a fuss, how can the crypto world get a good night's sleep?
View OriginalReply0
NotGonnaMakeItvip
· 12h ago
Here we go again? Politicians are fighting each other all day, and people in our crypto circle are just riding the roller coaster... They really treat us as ATMs.
View OriginalReply0
DefiPlaybookvip
· 12h ago
According to data, the Federal Reserve Chairman's survey questions essentially signal a disaster—political gamesmanship directly increases market uncertainty premiums. Based on on-chain data, recent stablecoin outflows have increased by approximately 18.7% month-over-month, which precisely reflects investors' risk-averse mentality. It is worth noting that the impact mechanisms of such political interference on traditional finance and the crypto market are completely different. Analyzing from three dimensions: first, regulatory vacuum periods lead to large-scale capital exits; second, unclear regulatory expectations directly suppress asset APY; third, participants in the smart contract ecosystem are more sensitive than traditional finance—essentially, centralized power struggles drag down the valuation of decentralized assets. The specific analysis is as follows: the real problem is not the survey itself, but that this political tug-of-war consumes the time that should be used for unifying policy frameworks.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)