2026-01-12 20:35:59

The keyword for 2026 is uncertainty. The market needs a truly operational stablecoin infrastructure, not just slogans.

UST implemented strict issuance cap control when launching on the mainnet; Hypernative's automatic price stabilization mechanism activates when prices deviate by 0.1%, enabling rapid response; lending functions have been supported from day one to ensure capital is fully utilized; BENJI introduces RWA track expansion; at the same time, the minting functions of Solana and Stellar are also in preparation. This combination aims to address the core pain points of stablecoins—covering the entire chain from supply-side control, price stabilization, capital efficiency, to on-chain liquidity—through practical implementation.

BENJI-6,24%

RWA-2,68%

SOL-2,74%

XLM-3,49%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MevWhisperer

· 6h ago

Honestly, a 0.1% deviation to trigger price stabilization? Sounds pretty strict, but the key is whether it can hold up when implemented. The lesson from UST was too deep... Being able to run the entire chain smoothly would be impressive; otherwise, it's just PPT coins. RWA is quite interesting, but supporting lending from day 1 is really smart—capital needs to start moving. When will Solana's minting truly take off? Just preparing is a bit empty.

View OriginalReply0

DEXRobinHood

· 6h ago

Basically, you need to have real substance and not just create dreams with PPTs all day long. Hypernative's 0.1% trigger mechanism is indeed detailed, but it depends on how it performs in real operation. RWA is quite interesting; at least someone is trying to link stablecoins with actual assets. Are Solana and Stellar's minting still in preparation? Let's wait and see. Hopefully, this time it won't be like the UST crash. Full-chain coverage sounds good, but I don't believe it can be 100% implemented. Starting lending from day one? Now that's pragmatic.

View OriginalReply0

NFTRegretful

· 6h ago

The words are good, but the UST past issues are still there. Can it really stabilize this time? A 0.1% fluctuation control sounds nice, but in practice, it's another story. I bet five bucks these project teams will still crash, that's just the routine. RWA is indeed new, but the multi-chain layout seems to be a safety net, smart move. Let's see when it actually lands; right now it's all PPTs. Forget it, not gonna watch anymore. If this stablecoin really becomes usable, I’ll eat my hat. Half believe, half wait and see, take it slow.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketBard

· 6h ago

Another big move with stablecoins... Will this truly be implementable this time, or just another round of retail investors getting harvested? No hype, no negativity. I appreciate Hypernative's 0.1% reaction speed, at least they don't just talk sweet like some projects. The RWA part is interesting, but it's hard to say on the Solana side.

View OriginalReply0

DAOdreamer

· 6h ago

Alright, another bunch of stablecoin promises, sounding better than singing. Only what can actually run is valuable; anyone can boast with just a plan. The 0.1% mechanism of UST sounds good, but what if a black swan event really happens? I'll believe it when Solana actually launches it.

View OriginalReply0

ForkThisDAO

· 6h ago

In simple terms, it's about calling out those projects that boast but don't deliver anything substantial. --- 0.1% automatic stable pricing? Sounds good, but I'm just worried it might be another PPT coin. --- Supporting lending from day one, I believe in this, otherwise it's no different from other stablecoins. --- RWA + stablecoin, this combo is interesting, but the key is whether it can truly survive. --- Both Solana and Stellar, why always need multiple chains? Wouldn't focusing resources be more stable? --- Strict control over supply side—I’ve seen this many times, and in the end... you know how it goes. --- Uncertainty is the key word. This statement is harsh, essentially admitting even they have no confidence. --- Looking at the UST experience, no matter how tough the mechanism is, it’s not necessarily reliable.

View OriginalReply0