Running a Walrus storage node for a month, staking 5000 WAL tokens, the actual APY is capped at 22.3%, which is even higher than the official announcement of 18%.
The rewards are divided very carefully. The majority of the storage reward—70%—is directly linked to the amount of data you store. The remaining 30% is a reward for the node's online uptime. I maintained an online status of 99.8%, earning an extra 150 WAL, which is a reflection of stability.
However, hardware configuration must be taken seriously. The system has clear performance requirements for nodes—at least 4 CPU cores and 8GB of RAM. If the configuration does not meet the standards, the system will consider your performance "insufficient" and will directly deduct rewards. I've seen people suffer this loss.
Currently, the total number of nodes in the ecosystem is just over 121, still in the relatively early stage. Entering at this point in time will indeed provide more stability for your earnings.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
NFT_Therapy_Group
· 14h ago
22.3% still exceeds expectations, not bad, more reliable than expected
The hardware part is indeed tricky; I saw someone almost get deducted points due to poor configuration
Only 121 nodes, early opportunities definitely exist
View OriginalReply0
RiddleMaster
· 14h ago
22.3% huh, higher than the official data? Suspect that the sample size might be too small.
Hardware requirements indeed deter many people. Starting with 4 cores and 8G sounds simple, but to run stably, cooling and network considerations are also necessary.
The number of 121 nodes sounds a bit sparse. Early dividends do exist, but risks are also present.
View OriginalReply0
RugPullAlertBot
· 14h ago
22.3%, huh? Sounds good, but I'm still a bit nervous.
The hardware threshold needs to be closely monitored; don't let the system determine "insufficient performance" and directly penalize you. This trap is too hidden.
121 nodes are indeed still too few. Early entry seems stable, but no one can predict the risks.
View OriginalReply0
Token_Sherpa
· 14h ago
ngl the tokenomics here actually smell legit for once... that 70/30 split between storage and uptime is proper incentive alignment, not the usual velocity trap garbage we see everywhere. but 121 nodes? come on, that's still bootstrapping liquidity at best. real question is whether this actually survives when the node count 10x and everyone realizes their hardware specs don't cut it lol
Reply0
WalletDetective
· 15h ago
22.3% APY? Higher than the official rate, probably because the ecosystem is still early. 121 nodes is indeed not many. Hardware requirements are strict; if not properly equipped, rewards are directly deducted. This part requires careful consideration.
View OriginalReply0
ser_ngmi
· 15h ago
The 22.3% APY is indeed impressive, exceeding expectations a bit. It must be thanks to the proper hardware configuration.
View OriginalReply0
WalletWhisperer
· 15h ago
22.3%? Bro, that's a pretty good return, even slightly exceeding expectations.
Hardware needs to be sufficient; 4-core 8G is the minimum. Don't underestimate this pit.
There are still opportunities to get in now with 121 nodes.
Running a Walrus storage node for a month, staking 5000 WAL tokens, the actual APY is capped at 22.3%, which is even higher than the official announcement of 18%.
The rewards are divided very carefully. The majority of the storage reward—70%—is directly linked to the amount of data you store. The remaining 30% is a reward for the node's online uptime. I maintained an online status of 99.8%, earning an extra 150 WAL, which is a reflection of stability.
However, hardware configuration must be taken seriously. The system has clear performance requirements for nodes—at least 4 CPU cores and 8GB of RAM. If the configuration does not meet the standards, the system will consider your performance "insufficient" and will directly deduct rewards. I've seen people suffer this loss.
Currently, the total number of nodes in the ecosystem is just over 121, still in the relatively early stage. Entering at this point in time will indeed provide more stability for your earnings.