If we define the early stage of blockchain as the "Internet of Value" era—that is, solving the problems of trust and value transfer—then what is currently dawning is actually a more ambitious direction: the "Memory Internet."
What does this mean? Humanity's civilization for the first time has the possibility to store those vast, unstructured things—photos, documents, data models, personal experience trajectories, organizational knowledge bases—in a way that is censorship-resistant, verifiable, and capable of being preserved across generations.
It sounds a bit abstract, but it becomes clear from a different perspective. For thousands of years, the memory of civilization has been like imprints on physical carriers—clay tablets, papyrus, books, film, hard drives. Each update of the carrier has been accompanied by irretrievable loss. The Library of Alexandria was burned, countless old photos faded—these are all "hardware failures" of human memory.
In the digital age, people thought the problem was solved. But in fact, it’s even more dangerous. Because now, data is entirely dependent on a few centralized cloud service providers. One company, one decision, one administrative order can delete, tamper with, or increase prices with a single click, or go offline due to bankruptcy, regulatory changes, or geopolitical conflicts. Your data’s life and death are now in someone else’s hands.
This is why the combination of distributed storage protocols + public chains has such enormous potential. Solutions represented by Walrus and the Sui ecosystem are creating a new historical inflection point.
**A Radical Redefinition of Permanence**
Rather than relying on a company's servers never to go down, it’s better to depend on a combination of technologies like global distributed nodes, erasure coding, and on-chain availability proofs. The logic is simple: as long as there is a sufficient proportion of nodes surviving in the global consensus network—even if a region is disconnected, a large number of nodes exit, or some countries set up network barriers—data can theoretically be restored indefinitely. This approaches the concept of "civilization-level redundancy"—far beyond any single company's backup plan.
**Memory Becomes Living**
Traditional archives are static—they remain unchanged. But data stored with protocols like Walrus can be programmed. Smart contracts can set automatic update rules, version iterations, delayed disclosures, encryption and decryption, and even "digital inheritance transfer"—you can set a data to be inherited by family members after your death for a certain number of years. Memory is no longer a static artifact but becomes a living, interactive, and value-adding entity.
**A Reversal of Cost Structures**
In the past, storage was purely expensive. But when storage itself becomes a vital infrastructure of the network, driven by storage incentives and usage rewards, "preserving human civilization’s memory" transforms into a self-consistent economic activity. Long-term preservation of high-value information like scientific data, historical archives, cultural heritage, and personal life records will naturally feedback into the network’s security and scalability.
The Walrus protocol of this generation may quietly change the material basis and intergenerational transmission of "memory" just like the printing press did for human civilization. 2026 might well be the beginning of this turning point.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
6 Likes
Reward
6
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MetaverseVagrant
· 15h ago
Damn, this idea really opened up my mind. The concept of data immortality is truly groundbreaking.
---
It's Walrus and Sui again. Can we stop praising these projects all the time... They're all too idealized.
---
Wait, digital inheritance transfer? Who inherits my coins when I die haha.
---
The Internet of Memory sounds like science fiction, but it's much better than having a company delete your account with a single click. I agree with that.
---
I'm just worried that in the end, big capital will still monopolize the distributed nodes... The tricks are too deep.
---
If humanity's civilization can really be preserved, that's more impressive than any mining.
---
Feels like just hype, how exactly would it be used? Do ordinary people need to put everything on the chain?
---
The anti-censorship part is truly outstanding. Finally, someone has broken through this barrier.
---
If Walrus is really so amazing, it should have exploded by 2026. It's still quietly unknown now.
---
History will remember data that cannot be deleted. I love this idea.
View OriginalReply0
FrogInTheWell
· 15h ago
Wow, isn't this just returning data sovereignty to individuals? Finally someone has clarified this issue.
I need to remember the term "civilized redundancy," it's brilliant.
But honestly, whether Walrus is reliable or not depends on how it actually performs in practice. Hopefully it won't become just another overhyped concept.
The digital inheritance transfer part is truly impressive. My parents' old photos no longer have to worry about a cloud service shutting down.
The key is having enough nodes alive. How many nodes are considered truly distributed? It doesn't seem that simple.
The papers all say this, but let's wait until it goes live to see how it actually works.
Centralized cloud providers are heartbreaking. There are countless cases where a government decree causes millions of data to disappear overnight.
The Internet of Memory sounds a bit chilling. Some regimes are actually more afraid of this thing.
2026? That's too optimistic, brother.
If the incentive mechanism can truly be self-consistent, that would be interesting. But the token economy has its pitfalls too.
How is the Walrus team’s background? Has anyone looked into it?
It's basically using distributed systems to fight against forgetting. The idea isn't new, but no one has really succeeded in doing it yet.
View OriginalReply0
ClassicDumpster
· 15h ago
Wow, that’s quite a boast. Let’s wait and see until 2026.
---
Walrus ecosystem is storytelling again. Can storage incentives be self-consistent? Easier said than done.
---
The concept of the Internet of Memory sounds a bit extreme, but can a distributed system truly operate 24/7 with zero failures? That’s a bit difficult.
---
Transferring digital inheritance sounds like science fiction, but who guarantees that nodes will always stay alive?
---
Another story with Sui and Walrus. Can this narrative in the crypto world really solve real-world problems?
---
From clay tablets to blockchain, the idea is good, but I’m worried it might just be an illusion.
---
The new take on cost reversal is innovative, but actually implementing it might be another story.
---
Censorship resistance, verifiability, cross-generational... sounds like selling the ultimate solution.
---
Centralized cloud services are indeed risky, but does full node backup necessarily mean stability? I have doubts.
---
Walrus protocol is compared to printing technology? That’s a ridiculous analogy, haha.
---
Civilization-level redundancy sounds very advanced, but can the actual economic model work? That’s the question.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropChaser
· 15h ago
Damn, this logic is pretty incredible. The concept of data immortality is truly a top-tier imagination.
---
That analogy about printing really broke my defense. Is Walrus really that awesome?
---
Sounds nice, but isn't it just us, the little guys, who have to maintain the network nodes? Do we get any benefits?
---
Memory Internet? It sounds like just another excuse for big companies to justify their dominance.
---
I'm a bit tempted by the "digital inheritance transfer" feature. Can I have my parents inherit my wallet?
---
It should have been done like this a long time ago. If it continues like this, deleting Google would wipe out all our youth.
---
2026? Bro, your market prediction is really confident. I bet five bucks it'll still be in the hype stage then.
---
I believe in distributed storage, but a reversal in cost structure? Wake up, someone will still have to pay the bill in the end.
---
So, is it still possible to enter the Sui ecosystem now? Just asking if it's a good time to buy the dip.
View OriginalReply0
ContractBugHunter
· 16h ago
The concept of civilization-level redundancy is amazing; finally, someone has explained storage thoroughly.
Wait, can Walrus really be this awesome, or is it just another hype?
I'm interested in digital inheritance, but how long will it take for the technology to actually be implemented?
The centralized cloud commerce model is indeed annoying; it should have been shattered long ago.
The analogy with printing is a bit exaggerated... but the idea is indeed innovative.
How is the Sui ecosystem doing lately? Can it keep up with this pace?
I just want to know if the costs can truly be reversed. Who will foot the bill?
If we define the early stage of blockchain as the "Internet of Value" era—that is, solving the problems of trust and value transfer—then what is currently dawning is actually a more ambitious direction: the "Memory Internet."
What does this mean? Humanity's civilization for the first time has the possibility to store those vast, unstructured things—photos, documents, data models, personal experience trajectories, organizational knowledge bases—in a way that is censorship-resistant, verifiable, and capable of being preserved across generations.
It sounds a bit abstract, but it becomes clear from a different perspective. For thousands of years, the memory of civilization has been like imprints on physical carriers—clay tablets, papyrus, books, film, hard drives. Each update of the carrier has been accompanied by irretrievable loss. The Library of Alexandria was burned, countless old photos faded—these are all "hardware failures" of human memory.
In the digital age, people thought the problem was solved. But in fact, it’s even more dangerous. Because now, data is entirely dependent on a few centralized cloud service providers. One company, one decision, one administrative order can delete, tamper with, or increase prices with a single click, or go offline due to bankruptcy, regulatory changes, or geopolitical conflicts. Your data’s life and death are now in someone else’s hands.
This is why the combination of distributed storage protocols + public chains has such enormous potential. Solutions represented by Walrus and the Sui ecosystem are creating a new historical inflection point.
**A Radical Redefinition of Permanence**
Rather than relying on a company's servers never to go down, it’s better to depend on a combination of technologies like global distributed nodes, erasure coding, and on-chain availability proofs. The logic is simple: as long as there is a sufficient proportion of nodes surviving in the global consensus network—even if a region is disconnected, a large number of nodes exit, or some countries set up network barriers—data can theoretically be restored indefinitely. This approaches the concept of "civilization-level redundancy"—far beyond any single company's backup plan.
**Memory Becomes Living**
Traditional archives are static—they remain unchanged. But data stored with protocols like Walrus can be programmed. Smart contracts can set automatic update rules, version iterations, delayed disclosures, encryption and decryption, and even "digital inheritance transfer"—you can set a data to be inherited by family members after your death for a certain number of years. Memory is no longer a static artifact but becomes a living, interactive, and value-adding entity.
**A Reversal of Cost Structures**
In the past, storage was purely expensive. But when storage itself becomes a vital infrastructure of the network, driven by storage incentives and usage rewards, "preserving human civilization’s memory" transforms into a self-consistent economic activity. Long-term preservation of high-value information like scientific data, historical archives, cultural heritage, and personal life records will naturally feedback into the network’s security and scalability.
The Walrus protocol of this generation may quietly change the material basis and intergenerational transmission of "memory" just like the printing press did for human civilization. 2026 might well be the beginning of this turning point.