If blockchain wants to be accepted by mainstream finance, it must face a real-world problem: on one hand, it needs to meet regulatory transparency requirements, and on the other hand, it must protect user privacy. These two demands seem incompatible, but DUSK Network, founded in 2018, has taken them as its main focus—to build an infrastructure that ensures privacy protection while complying with regulations.



**Ingenious Architecture Design**

DUSK employs a modular approach. The bottom layer is DUSK Layer 1, responsible for high-performance consensus and settlement. The next layer is DuskEVM, which handles the specific logic of applications. The interesting aspect of this design is that DuskEVM is fully compatible with the Ethereum Virtual Machine. In other words, developers who have written smart contracts in Solidity can almost effortlessly deploy their projects on DUSK and also utilize the unique features of the underlying layer. This approach of compatibility with differentiation truly lowers the barrier to entry for developers.

**Technical Core of Privacy Protection**

DUSK’s core competitive advantage comes from the Hedger module. It combines two cryptographic technologies—zero-knowledge proofs and homomorphic encryption—to enable private transactions within the EVM environment. What does this mean? The specific details of transactions are invisible to ordinary users, but audit agencies or regulatory bodies with specific keys can verify whether transactions are legitimate and compliant with AML and other financial regulations. Privacy and auditability are thus balanced rather than opposed.
DUSK13,81%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropHarvestervip
· 6h ago
Zero-knowledge proofs combined with homomorphic encryption—this combination is indeed powerful. But to be honest, do audit departments really have that much patience to verify everything?
View OriginalReply0
ZKProofEnthusiastvip
· 01-11 03:58
Can privacy and regulation truly coexist harmoniously? Honestly, it all comes down to execution. Hedger's set of strategies sounds good, but ecosystem implementation is the real benchmark.
View OriginalReply0
LoneValidatorvip
· 01-11 03:58
Can privacy and compliance truly be balanced? I always feel like these two still end up clashing...
View OriginalReply0
SerumDegenvip
· 01-11 03:58
ngl, the privacy-compliance balance they're pitching sounds good on paper but... where's the actual on-chain signal proving this doesn't cascade into another regulatory liquidity trap? seen too many chains get rekt trying to play both sides
Reply0
AlphaBrainvip
· 01-11 03:57
To be honest, the whole privacy versus compliance thing is kind of a false dichotomy. DUSK's approach is actually pretty interesting, but at the end of the day, what matters is whether the implementation can really make sense in practice.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleSurfervip
· 01-11 03:46
Can privacy and transparency be balanced? It sounds good, but whether it can actually be implemented depends on whether it can truly be realized in practice.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeLadyvip
· 01-11 03:30
ngl the zk + homomorphic encryption combo sounds clean on paper, but we've seen this privacy-compliance dance before... curious if they actually hit that "optimal window" or if it's just another gas optimization fantasy lol
Reply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)