Offshore funds are lining up to enter the market, and this is no longer just industry rumors. A few days ago, I was chatting casually with friends involved in institutional investing, and they clearly said that now the money overseas is all waiting for an exit. Sitting on continuously devaluing fiat currency is pointless; it’s better to take a chance. Frankly, this wave of market activity is essentially driven by macroeconomic factors.
Some might ask, isn’t crypto an independent market? Why does it still have to look at the central bank’s stance? That idea was valid five years ago, but now? It’s long outdated. Just look at the data from the past two years — a policy shift by a certain country’s central bank directly triggered a surge in the crypto market. During the tense trade situation in 2019, Bitcoin shot from $3,000 to $13,000 in one go, which is the most direct proof. Macro economy has become the behind-the-scenes manipulator of the crypto market; bypassing it is simply not realistic.
But what’s the biggest difference between this round of market and the peak in 2021? Back then, it was an era where “buy blindly and make money.” Now, it’s different. Altcoins are exploding in number, but funds are more selective — they only pour into projects with a story, real ecosystem, and active communities. I recently observed an interesting phenomenon: projects with frequent team-user interactions and high community engagement, even if their fundamentals aren’t top-tier, can still outperform similar projects in gains. In a liquidity-rich environment, consensus and sentiment often matter more than the technology itself in determining price movements.
However, there’s no free lunch in the world. The real risk isn’t market corrections but stepping into air coins. I’ve seen too many people brainwashed by the phrase “high returns,” throwing money into projects with no real business, only to end up losing everything. This lesson is deeply ingrained.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BlockTalk
· 16h ago
The inflow of offshore funds, to put it simply, is just big institutions looking for opportunities. Everyone is anxious about fiat currency devaluation. But the key question is—can retail investors catch this wave, or will they just become bagholders?
Can high community engagement beat fundamentals? That logic seems a bit hollow. It still feels like you need to pick the right targets; otherwise, how long can emotions alone sustain?
Consensus and sentiment > technical analysis? Then why did all those altcoins in 2021 die out? It’s because the story was over once the narrative ended. Which projects that survived truly had something solid?
Being cautious of air coins is correct, but the problem is—how do you tell the difference? Is it just about whether the community is active? It seems like even activity levels can be faked nowadays.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeNightmare
· 16h ago
It's the same macroeconomic rhetoric again, but to be honest, watching that pile of offshore funds waiting to enter the market makes me anxious, because I know that when they actually pour in, gas fees will be so high that it will drive people crazy.
View OriginalReply0
ApeEscapeArtist
· 16h ago
I believe in the influx of offshore funds, but the key is whether they can hold on until the end. It seems that the big players have already jumped on board.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunterWang
· 17h ago
I agree with the macro pushers, but can consensus and sentiment really determine the price? Doesn't that mean whoever can tell the best story wins... No wonder the most active projects in those communities are the most prone to collapse.
Offshore funds are lining up to enter the market, and this is no longer just industry rumors. A few days ago, I was chatting casually with friends involved in institutional investing, and they clearly said that now the money overseas is all waiting for an exit. Sitting on continuously devaluing fiat currency is pointless; it’s better to take a chance. Frankly, this wave of market activity is essentially driven by macroeconomic factors.
Some might ask, isn’t crypto an independent market? Why does it still have to look at the central bank’s stance? That idea was valid five years ago, but now? It’s long outdated. Just look at the data from the past two years — a policy shift by a certain country’s central bank directly triggered a surge in the crypto market. During the tense trade situation in 2019, Bitcoin shot from $3,000 to $13,000 in one go, which is the most direct proof. Macro economy has become the behind-the-scenes manipulator of the crypto market; bypassing it is simply not realistic.
But what’s the biggest difference between this round of market and the peak in 2021? Back then, it was an era where “buy blindly and make money.” Now, it’s different. Altcoins are exploding in number, but funds are more selective — they only pour into projects with a story, real ecosystem, and active communities. I recently observed an interesting phenomenon: projects with frequent team-user interactions and high community engagement, even if their fundamentals aren’t top-tier, can still outperform similar projects in gains. In a liquidity-rich environment, consensus and sentiment often matter more than the technology itself in determining price movements.
However, there’s no free lunch in the world. The real risk isn’t market corrections but stepping into air coins. I’ve seen too many people brainwashed by the phrase “high returns,” throwing money into projects with no real business, only to end up losing everything. This lesson is deeply ingrained.