DeFi is undergoing a transformation—from solely competing in liquidity scale to a new stage of financial complexity.



In this shift, some projects choose to follow a standardized approach, focusing on trading or yield aggregation; but truly imaginative projects are those that dare to introduce structured finance. They bring complex logic from traditional finance—such as interest rate pricing, risk splitting, and yield layering—onto the blockchain, building a universal financial infrastructure layer.

This is the key—not just applications, but infrastructure.

Once you understand what structured products, maturity mismatches, and cash flow reorganization are, you'll realize why this layer is eventually needed on-chain. Especially when real-world assets (RWA) truly enter the blockchain at scale, it’s impossible to remain at the primitive stages of "collateralized lending" or "simple trading"—they must be re-priced, disassembled, and recombined.

From this perspective, projects that choose to develop in the structured finance track are essentially preparing for the RWA era. The future of on-chain financial competition will not be a TVL number game, but who can become the optimal structural choice for real assets entering the blockchain.

This path is worth continuous attention.
RWA1.03%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
OffchainWinnervip
· 18h ago
Well said, but who is really doing this now? I think most are still competing over TVL.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainDetectiveBingvip
· 01-07 16:55
Someone finally said it: the TVL approach is long outdated; true financial infrastructure is the real way forward.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-9f682d4cvip
· 01-07 16:53
Structured finance is indeed the future direction, but it's still too early, and most projects are still experimenting blindly. To put it nicely, it's infrastructure; to be blunt, isn't it just more complex risk bundling... We'll see who can survive when RWA actually arrives.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketBuyervip
· 01-07 16:49
Basically, it's about who can become the Goldman Sachs of the blockchain. Stacking TVL has already become meaningless.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainArchaeologistvip
· 01-07 16:48
That's right, the TVL arms race should have ended long ago, and this gameplay has already become overly competitive. The real competition should be in the layer of structured finance—whoever masters this logic will be the true winner.
View OriginalReply0
OvertimeSquidvip
· 01-07 16:45
To be honest, someone should have figured out structured finance long ago. Just comparing TVL numbers doesn't mean much.
View OriginalReply0
RetailTherapistvip
· 01-07 16:33
Sounds like bragging... Structured finance sounds sophisticated, but can this complex logic really run smoothly on the blockchain? I’d like to see who can master the maturity mismatch on-chain.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)