DeFi liquidity mining may seem simple, but there are many nuances. Recently, many beginners have asked: I clearly provided liquidity, my tokens didn't lose value, so why did my funds still decrease? This question is very insightful, so let's use a very relatable example to clarify.



Imagine you and a friend open a small shop together, selling apples and bananas. You both contribute 100 apples (worth 100 yuan) and 100 cash (enough to buy 100 bananas), for a total of 200 yuan in assets. The shop has an unwritten rule — the number of apples must be equal to the number of bananas.

Suddenly, one day, the supply of apples becomes scarce, and the price skyrockets to 2 yuan each. Customers flock in to buy apples, the shop's apples become fewer and fewer, while bananas pile up. When the system automatically balances, problems occur: to maintain the balance, you have to keep exchanging apples for bananas.

When closing the shop and settling accounts, the total book value is only about 282 yuan. But if you hadn't participated in liquidity provision and just held onto 100 apples and 100 yuan cash, it would now be worth 300 yuan (100 apples × 2 yuan each + 100 yuan cash).

Comparing the two, you find you've lost nearly 20 yuan — this is what is called impermanent loss. The more volatile the price fluctuations, the bigger this "trap" becomes. That's also why some people end up losing money instead of earning after providing liquidity.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MerkleMaidvip
· 01-08 01:52
This apple and banana analogy is brilliant; I finally understand why my LP position has been hit so hard.
View OriginalReply0
RugPullAlarmvip
· 01-07 16:51
Impermanent loss is indeed a big pit, but the problem is that most project teams simply don't explain this clearly. I've looked at many LP pools, and a quick check of fund concentration reveals anomalies—several large addresses controlling the market, and liquidity isn't truly "liquid." On-chain data shows that the actual APY of many mining pools is barely half of what is advertised, with the rest being all hype. In plain terms, it's just a different way of running a Ponzi scheme.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeVictimvip
· 01-07 16:50
Wow, this example is incredible. I was scammed like this before, contributing liquidity for free and even losing money.
View OriginalReply0
GasDevourervip
· 01-07 16:35
Damn, that's why I always get liquidated during liquidity mining. --- Wow, the apple and banana analogy is brilliant. Now I finally understand where my 18 bucks went. --- So holding is the way to go? Liquidity mining just sounds like a trap. --- Impermanent loss really is haunting, the more volatile the trading pair, the more painful it is. --- Damn, my partner didn't tell me there are so many twists and turns. All that effort was in vain. --- Now I understand the real reason why those big V influencers don't take us to mine. They've been mostly wiped out. --- Price surges and I end up losing money. I finally understand this logic now. It's heartbreaking.
View OriginalReply0
BoredWatchervip
· 01-07 16:24
Damn, I’ve fallen into the trap of impermanent loss before, and now I finally understand it.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)