The convergence of distributed ledger technology with established financial infrastructure is worth examining closely.



SWIFT already operates within a mature governance structure and regulatory framework that underpins global settlements. The real opportunity lies in optimizing this infrastructure network through DLT innovation—making cross-border transactions faster and more efficient without dismantling existing systems.

Instead of replacing legacy networks, the path forward appears to be integration. Layer existing protocols onto proven institutional frameworks. That approach reduces adoption friction while preserving the regulatory oversight that financial institutions depend on.

Ripple's positioning around this convergence highlights a broader trend: blockchain technology becoming infrastructure enhancement rather than disruption.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
BlockchainArchaeologistvip
· 01-07 00:55
To be honest, I've been looking at this approach for a while... Integration rather than revolution sounds safe but a bit too conservative. The SWIFT system is indeed deeply rooted, but the question is, can DLT really only serve as an auxiliary tool? It feels like we're still compromising for the vested interests. Ripple's story is quite impressive, but I want to see how quickly it can actually be implemented... Can't wait for a slow and gradual process.
View OriginalReply0
BlockTalkvip
· 01-07 00:53
That's right, integration is the way out. Don't keep dreaming about overthrowing the financial system—it's just nonsense. --- The SWIFT system indeed can't be bypassed. Instead of fighting against it, it's better to think about how to make them cooperate... --- Hmm, Ripple's positioning is quite clear this time, much more reliable than those projects that always talk about revolution. --- Integration > replacement. There's nothing wrong with this logic. If the regulatory hurdle can't be cleared, everything else is pointless. --- The key is to reduce adoption resistance; otherwise, no matter how good the technology is, it won't enter the traditional financial sector.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeLovervip
· 01-07 00:50
Well said, this is true realism. Instead of shouting about overthrowing everything, it's better to think about how to embed new technology, which is actually easier to implement. Just wondering how the SWIFT folks will react... Integration is possible, but can it really be fast? We've been talking about this for so many years. I believe in blockchain as infrastructure enhancement, but the key is still whether someone is willing to pay. Ripple's approach indeed plays it smart. It would be even better if we could also optimize the gas fee.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-5854de8bvip
· 01-07 00:42
Uh... after saying so much, it still depends on traditional financial players giving the nod. Is Web3 really that revolutionary? Integration sounds good, but the reality is whoever holds the discourse power makes the rules. I'm already tired of Ripple's tricks, still flirting with central banks to deal with compliance... what's the point of that? DLT optimizing SWIFT? Feels like just putting new wine in old bottles. Not dismantling the existing system = forever constrained by the existing system, understand?
View OriginalReply0
token_therapistvip
· 01-07 00:41
That's quite realistic, but this set of logic still sounds a bit idealistic. Do those SWIFT folks really know how to make DLT obediently "enhance" their systems? Breaking the利益格局 is easier said than done.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • بالعربية
  • Português (Brasil)
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Español
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Русский
  • 繁體中文
  • Українська
  • Tiếng Việt