Infinex Funding Controversy: On-Chain Data Surfaces



In the past few hours, on-chain monitoring tools have detected unusual signals—large numbers of new addresses flooding in just before the rule change, pointing to price levels that shouldn't have appeared. What exactly is happening behind the scenes?

Infinex's public fundraising progress has been lukewarm. Strict identity verification requirements combined with a $2,500 per-wallet cap have directly dampened participation enthusiasm. Logically, the scale of this round of funding should fall within the range of $2 million to $3 million. Sounds reasonable, right?

However, the plot suddenly takes a turn.

Data begins to speak. On-chain activity patterns have strangely changed direction. Wallet activities that entered early to avoid restrictions have surged, and transaction chains have become more complex. This isn't just simple market fluctuation—it's systemic abnormality.

For anyone paying attention to the DeFi ecosystem and funding transparency, this warrants deep investigation. Can on-chain data lie? Maybe not, but it can conceal the truth.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
SquidTeachervip
· 01-06 23:53
Another new trick to harvest the little guys, change the rules and you can bypass restrictions. I've seen this tactic too many times.
View OriginalReply0
ProveMyZKvip
· 01-06 23:51
Damn, isn't this routine too familiar? Every time there's a change in the rules before fundraising, someone jumps the gun? Clearly on the blockchain, straightforward matters are being deliberately muddled into confusion.
View OriginalReply0
FantasyGuardianvip
· 01-06 23:51
It's the same old story, money is all about finding ways to exploit loopholes.
View OriginalReply0
ProxyCollectorvip
· 01-06 23:50
Ah... it's that old trick of circumventing restrictions again. Doesn't anyone want to play properly? I'm tired of these kinds of operations right before the rules change. It's always the same. Wait, the $2500 limit was broken so easily? How did they do it? The phrase "On-chain data conceals the truth" is perfect; it just points out the core issue. Another suspicious fundraising round, DeFi is being messed up like this.
View OriginalReply0
ForkThisDAOvip
· 01-06 23:42
Bro, this routine feels a bit familiar. They do this every time before fundraising. --- It's this kind of "systemic anomaly" again. I think they just want to scoop up cheap tokens. --- Can on-chain data hide the truth? Come on, if they really wanted to cheat, they'd have been caught long ago. --- The $2500 cap is pretty awkward. Are they afraid ordinary people will come in? --- The surge in wallet activities to bypass restrictions... now that's the smell of insider trading.
View OriginalReply0
ZenZKPlayervip
· 01-06 23:34
Coming with this again? Laying ambushes in advance to avoid restrictions—this tactic is so familiar it’s worn out. Infinex’s move here also seems like playing word games. The $2,500 limit is supposedly to prevent whales, but what’s the reality? On-chain data has already made it clear. Wait, are the $2-3 million financings really going to be handled at this scale? I have my doubts. It’s frustrating; this is exactly the kind of issue that DeFi should be criticized for. The term "systemic anomaly" is well-used, but no one dares to take action and investigate further.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)