2025-12-26 18:21:46

Errors spread fastest in the shadows. When no one's watching, distortions compound silently—until the damage is already done.

That's why human oversight in AI training matters so much. It's not about slowing things down; it's about catching problems early, before they metastasize. A human-guided feedback loop keeps models grounded, ensures they actually align with what users need in the real world, not some abstract ideal.

The difference? Models that stay dependable. Systems you can trust, because someone was paying attention all along.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SignatureLiquidator

· 6h ago

In simple terms, someone needs to keep an eye on it; otherwise, AI could go astray.

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainWorker

· 6h ago

Manual supervision really needs to be attentive; otherwise, AI might start to distort secretly.

View OriginalReply0

SchrodingerAirdrop

· 6h ago

Artificial review sounds good in theory, but in reality, who is really paying attention? Most of the time, it's still just for passing the buck.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeTherapist

· 6h ago

Bro, there's nothing wrong with what you're saying, but the reality is that most projects don't have anyone truly overseeing them; everything runs automatically through automated processes.

View OriginalReply0

just_another_wallet

· 6h ago

Manual review really needs to be attentive; otherwise, once the model is biased, no one can save it.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-afe07a92

· 7h ago

Manual supervision sounds good, but in reality, how many teams are really taking this seriously...

View OriginalReply0