RWA has been a hot topic in the past two years, with projects on-chain US debt and US stock tokenization also emerging in clusters. But honestly, whether these applications can really take off depends on one word—speed.



Imagine institutions holding hundreds of millions of dollars, with slow settlement processes and frequent congestion in stablecoin transfers. Why would they participate? That’s the ceiling for most RWA projects.

For this reason, I am optimistic about public chains that genuinely address on-chain settlement and transaction speed issues. They are not just storytelling, but solving the critical challenge needed for RWA to truly land.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
SerumDegenvip
· 5h ago
ngl the settlement speed copium is real... most rwa projects are just bagholding infrastructure before the cascade hits
Reply0
MetaLord420vip
· 5h ago
Basically, it's all useless if the speed isn't enough. Settlement congestion is really a meme; institutions don't care at all. Wait, why haven't those RWA projects that boast every day already collapsed? TPS is the real deal; everything else is fake. Fast speed = more money, this logic makes sense.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHarvestervip
· 5h ago
Basically, if TPS isn't good enough, everything else is pointless. Speed is the key, everything else is superficial. Institutions are focused on this; traffic congestion really discourages them. RWA is hot, but lagging is indeed a dead end. Public chains that solve speed issues are the real key question. If settlement is slow, institutional funds simply can't flow in; that's a hard flaw. No matter how many stories you tell, it's useless; real solutions are needed to improve TPS. The ceiling is the ceiling; if it can't be faster, nothing can be moved.
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsTinfoilHatvip
· 5h ago
In plain terms, RWA without speed is just self-indulgence. The settlement congestion issue is really intense; how can institutions wait? Having only the tokenization concept is not enough; it has to actually run smoothly. With such low TPS, you still want to attract institutional funds? Dream on. Those projects hyping RWA, first optimize your own chain before boasting. Speed is the ultimate goal; everything else is superficial. RWA has been talked about for two years, but no one has truly solved the speed problem yet.
View OriginalReply0
LidoStakeAddictvip
· 5h ago
I told you, TPS is the key to RWA Who the hell wants to participate if settlement is slow If speed doesn't keep up, even the best stories are useless Solana this wave kind of knows what they're doing Talking about tokenization every day, but it's clogged up to hell, hilarious Solving speed issues is the real necessity Big institutions don't care how grand your concept is, they only look at how fast settlement is Now I understand why some public chains can stand out RWA is just a speed race, isn't it Honestly, most projects are just storytelling
View OriginalReply0
SybilAttackVictimvip
· 5h ago
At the end of the day, it's all about TPS. Just hyping RWA is useless. No one can save you if the settlement bottleneck occurs; it all depends on the chain's true capability. Only when institutions really come in will you know who is genuine. Without speed, everything is pointless. This wave of RWA hype is just a sieve; only those who focus on performance will survive.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)