2025-12-25 07:26:53

The market capitalization of stablecoins has surpassed the $310 billion mark. What does this figure reflect?

Regulatory frameworks are tightening across the board. Hong Kong has set a licensing threshold of HKD 25 million, the US is implementing the GENIUS Act to enforce linkage with US bonds, and Europe is imposing 100% reserve requirements along with sandbox management systems. While these appear to be compliance measures, they effectively serve as a way to give private institutions the appearance of central banks—stablecoins are gradually evolving into an officially recognized "digital dollar" system.

Emerging markets are adopting stablecoins on a large scale. Data shows that 47% of users in Nigeria and Turkey have shifted to stablecoins to hedge against local currency devaluation. This phenomenon is increasingly common in countries like the Philippines and Argentina, reflecting that stablecoins are becoming a primary tool for hedging currency volatility. This not only demonstrates market demand but also represents another way the US dollar's influence is expanding.

But what are the risks that cannot be ignored? The de-pegging of USDC during the Silicon Valley Bank incident and the spiral collapse of UST serve as lessons highlighting the importance of the "peg" in stablecoins. The core factors in choosing stablecoins should include: whether reserves are regularly audited, whether they have regulatory licenses, and the financial strength of the issuing institution. Avoid blindly following trends or being attracted by high yields promised by algorithmic tokens.

From the perspective of cross-border payments, traditional digital currency solutions face competitive pressure. Due to their high liquidity, low costs, and fast settlement, stablecoins are rapidly expanding their market share in certain application scenarios. This is not a technical issue but a result of evolving regulations.

There are no completely safe options in the digital currency market—only by understanding the rules can participants make more prudent decisions. Keeping abreast of regulatory developments, assessing the strength of issuers, and paying attention to reserve transparency are fundamental practices that are crucial for long-term participants.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ProofOfNothing

· 4h ago

Basically, it's just the dollar wearing a different disguise to continue scamming investors.

View OriginalReply0

OnchainUndercover

· 4h ago

Basically, it's just the US dollar wearing a different disguise to continue scamming retail investors. The US dollar is being directly dumped with stablecoins, causing each country's local currency to fall one by one. Emerging markets are even voluntarily rushing in, which is outrageous. I saw through that wave of USDC; reserve assets are simply not trustworthy. It's better to just hold native assets directly. If you ask me, the most worth警惕 is that 100% reserve claim. It sounds serious, but it's actually just a cover for compliance. In cross-border payments, stablecoins are indeed fast, but at what cost? Your financial sovereignty is gradually being eroded step by step.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidatedTwice

· 4h ago

Here comes the story of cutting leeks again, but this time it's stablecoins The dollar system is over-leveraged, emerging markets are the bagholders, same old tricks I still vividly remember the USDC de-pegging incident. Who dares to believe this thing is truly stable? Basically, it's a gamble on which institution won't fail. If you choose wrong, you're doomed The cross-border payment part is pure nonsense; not many people actually use it

View OriginalReply0

MetaDreamer

· 4h ago

310 billion, in simple terms, is just the US dollar wearing a different mask. So, the 47% of people in Nigeria are actually using the US dollar indirectly, which is a bit ironic. The Silicon Valley Bank incident is still fresh in memory. I don't believe anyone who claims their stablecoin is definitely safe. Tightening regulations may seem compliant, but in reality, it's just centralizing power—ironic or not. The high-yield claims of algorithmic coins are just talk; when greed kicks in, you need to stay clear-headed. In cross-border payments, stablecoins have indeed outcompeted older projects... low cost and fast liquidity—who wouldn't be tempted? There's no such thing as absolute safety—it's the truth. But few people really do their homework.

View OriginalReply0

failed_dev_successful_ape