Quick thought about @idOS_network, because a lot of people are still looking at it through the wrong lens.

Think about it this way:
Apps come and go. You try one, leave it, move to another, but your identity shouldn’t have to be rebuilt every single time.

idOS sits between users and apps, making sure neither side owns the other.
• Your data is yours, not the app’s
• Apps don’t store your identity, they just get access if you say yes
• Once you grant access, it can stay active without re-doing KYC every time
• Everything runs on a distributed network, not one company’s server
• Builders can plug in different services instead of rebuilding identity from scratch

This perspective makes it clear why idOS keeps stressing neutrality and composability. That’s what makes idOS feel different to me.

Does this change how you look at idOS?