Scan to Download Gate App
qrCode
More Download Options
Don't remind me again today

Down under, a bold legal challenge is unfolding. A teenager has filed a lawsuit against Australia's government, fighting to overturn their controversial ban on social media access for anyone under 16. The plaintiff's argument? Rather than protecting kids, this restriction might actually push them toward riskier corners of the internet.



The teen claims the policy misses the mark entirely. By blocking legitimate platforms, young people could be driven to unregulated spaces where dangers lurk without oversight. There's also the practical reality: kids will find workarounds. VPNs, fake IDs, borrowed accounts—the ban might end up being little more than security theater.

What makes this case interesting isn't just the age of the challenger, but the core question it raises: Can governments truly regulate young people off the internet, or does prohibition simply breed more creative evasion? The outcome could set a precedent far beyond Australia's borders.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
Whale_Whisperervip
· 12-02 09:47
The ban trap... really doesn't work, kids will just play with even wilder things. VPNs and borrowing accounts, the government can't block those either, it's purely sticking one’s head in the sand. This guy from Australia is bold enough, quite interesting. Rather than banning, it's better to educate; this bill is essentially a disguised safety act. This lawsuit has woken people up; regulation will never keep up with human creativity.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-addcaaf7vip
· 12-02 09:40
The ban is just funny; the more you ban it, the more people want to play. As soon as you open a VPN, everything is solved. The Australian government's move is indeed ridiculous. What this kid said is spot on; it's better to facilitate than to block, really. This kind of regulation has been tried in web3 long ago and it simply doesn't work.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeSobbervip
· 12-02 09:38
The ban on this matter is only a temporary fix and doesn't address the root cause... If children really want to play, installing a VPN solves everything, but it actually drives them into darker corners, which is more dangerous.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainGrillervip
· 12-02 09:28
Banning may not necessarily provide protection; instead, it might push people into the dark web. This guy from Australia has hit the nail on the head.
View OriginalReply0
UnruggableChadvip
· 12-02 09:22
Ha, another ban play, the government will never understand this trap. --- Banning VPNs, banning accounts... LOL, kids are much smarter than you. --- This guy really understands, it’s better to guide than block, the more you ban, the more chaos. --- Australia's operation is too typical, a classic self-destructive clause of regulatoryism. --- It’s just a security theater, the black market is more active than the regular army, a timeless truth. --- I just want to see the progress of this lawsuit, betting five bucks that it will win. --- Speechless, a bunch of adults deciding what kids can do, then being surprised to find they just bypassed it. --- This case can break through, and countries will have to re-examine their policies.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)