In the past two months, miners have not been having a good time. The price of Bitcoin has pulled back, while the total network computing power has surged to a new high of 1078 EH/s, causing miner revenue to drop directly from 60 million dollars to 40 million, a fall of 35%.
The income structure is actually quite simple: 144 blocks per day, with a fixed reward of 3.125 BTC per block, plus transaction fees. But here comes the problem—Computing Power has skyrocketed, earning only $0.036 per TH/s per day, and the profits are becoming thinner and thinner.
Electricity costs are the lifeline for miners. New machines like the S21 can still earn some cash in low electricity price areas; however, older equipment like the S19 is in dire straits, with electricity prices at $0.06/kWh basically just breaking even. The cost differences among leading mining companies are also significant: Marathon's cost to mine one Bitcoin is approximately $39,235, while Riot's is $46,324, and the industry average is estimated to be around $58,500. But this is just the cash cost. When factoring in depreciation, impairment, and options as those accounting expenses? The total cost can soar over $100,000, with some companies already showing losses on their books.
The differentiation in the circle is very obvious now. Large mining enterprises are supported by efficient equipment, cheap electricity, and financing capabilities, maintaining positive cash flow, and they tend to hoard coins instead of selling; small and medium miners and high-cost players are struggling, as a fall in coin prices or an increase in difficulty brings them close to the breakeven line, leading many to choose to shut down while waiting for difficulty adjustments. As long as cash flow is not interrupted, miners will continue to mine, and network difficulty will automatically balance. The real risk? Financing gets stuck or electricity prices suddenly surge, at which point computing power may concentrate or retreat on a large scale.
The resilience of the industry is still present, but the Matthew effect is becoming more and more evident. The next round of growth will depend on capital and energy efficiency.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
FUD_Vaccinated
· 2h ago
The Matthew effect is really heartbreaking here; small miners are really being squeezed out of the game. The difference between cash costs and book costs is just outrageous.
View OriginalReply0
PrivacyMaximalist
· 11-30 01:51
The recent big pump in computing power is really outrageous, and small and medium miners are being squeezed out.
View OriginalReply0
FarmToRiches
· 11-30 01:51
Computing Power reached a new high, but the income was instead cut by a third. This is the magical reality of web3, I'm laughing to death.
View OriginalReply0
DegenMcsleepless
· 11-30 01:49
The combination of computing power hitting new highs and a pullback in coin prices is really too much for small and medium miners to bear.
I see many people using the strategy of shutting down and waiting for difficulty retargeting, just waiting for the moment when the market rebounds.
View OriginalReply0
SerumDegen
· 11-30 01:48
ngl this is just liquidation cascade in slow motion... retail miners getting rekt while marathon sits pretty on that 39k cost basis lmao
Reply0
GasFeeSurvivor
· 11-30 01:40
The Matthew effect is most evident in mining right now. Small miners really should wash up and go to sleep.
View OriginalReply0
ForkItAllDay
· 11-30 01:25
Brothers are starting the shutdown wave again, the trap of big fish eating small fish, the difficulty is explosive and really exciting.
View OriginalReply0
SandwichTrader
· 11-30 01:23
New computing power peaks but income is cut by 35%, this logic is really amazing, the Matthew effect crushes small and medium miners.
In the past two months, miners have not been having a good time. The price of Bitcoin has pulled back, while the total network computing power has surged to a new high of 1078 EH/s, causing miner revenue to drop directly from 60 million dollars to 40 million, a fall of 35%.
The income structure is actually quite simple: 144 blocks per day, with a fixed reward of 3.125 BTC per block, plus transaction fees. But here comes the problem—Computing Power has skyrocketed, earning only $0.036 per TH/s per day, and the profits are becoming thinner and thinner.
Electricity costs are the lifeline for miners. New machines like the S21 can still earn some cash in low electricity price areas; however, older equipment like the S19 is in dire straits, with electricity prices at $0.06/kWh basically just breaking even. The cost differences among leading mining companies are also significant: Marathon's cost to mine one Bitcoin is approximately $39,235, while Riot's is $46,324, and the industry average is estimated to be around $58,500. But this is just the cash cost. When factoring in depreciation, impairment, and options as those accounting expenses? The total cost can soar over $100,000, with some companies already showing losses on their books.
The differentiation in the circle is very obvious now. Large mining enterprises are supported by efficient equipment, cheap electricity, and financing capabilities, maintaining positive cash flow, and they tend to hoard coins instead of selling; small and medium miners and high-cost players are struggling, as a fall in coin prices or an increase in difficulty brings them close to the breakeven line, leading many to choose to shut down while waiting for difficulty adjustments. As long as cash flow is not interrupted, miners will continue to mine, and network difficulty will automatically balance. The real risk? Financing gets stuck or electricity prices suddenly surge, at which point computing power may concentrate or retreat on a large scale.
The resilience of the industry is still present, but the Matthew effect is becoming more and more evident. The next round of growth will depend on capital and energy efficiency.