👀 家人们,每天看行情、刷大佬观点,却从来不开口说两句?你的观点可能比你想的更有价值!
广场新人 & 回归福利正式上线!不管你是第一次发帖还是久违回归,我们都直接送你奖励!🎁
每月 $20,000 奖金等你来领!
📅 活动时间: 长期有效(月底结算)
💎 参与方式:
用户需为首次发帖的新用户或一个月未发帖的回归用户。
发帖时必须带上话题标签: #我在广场发首帖 。
内容不限:币圈新闻、行情分析、晒单吐槽、币种推荐皆可。
💰 奖励机制:
必得奖:发帖体验券
每位有效发帖用户都可获得 $50 仓位体验券。(注:每月奖池上限 $20,000,先到先得!如果大家太热情,我们会继续加码!)
进阶奖:发帖双王争霸
月度发帖王: 当月发帖数量最多的用户,额外奖励 50U。
月度互动王: 当月帖子互动量(点赞+评论+转发+分享)最高的用户,额外奖励 50U。
📝 发帖要求:
帖子字数需 大于30字,拒绝纯表情或无意义字符。
内容需积极健康,符合社区规范,严禁广告引流及违规内容。
💡 你的观点可能会启发无数人,你的第一次分享也许就是成为“广场大V”的起点,现在就开始广场创作之旅吧!
Ripple vs. SEC: Legal Drama Escalates – A Turning Point for Cryptocurrency? XRP Price Set for Major Breakout to $1
In a continued legal tussle that could potentially reshape the cryptocurrency landscape, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has intensified its efforts to seek a mid-case appeal in the ongoing Ripple vs. XRP battle. This move follows a recent ruling by Judge Analisa Torres, which found Ripple guilty of violating federal securities laws in its dealings with institutional investors while sparing retail investors.
Ripple’s Argument Against Appeal
Ripple, the blockchain-based company closely associated with the XRP cryptocurrency, had initially contested the SEC’s appeal request, asserting that it lacked sufficient merit. However, the SEC has responded assertively, emphasizing the industry-wide significance of the legal issues at hand.
The heart of the matter revolves around whether Ripple’s actions in offering XRP to retail investors on cryptocurrency exchanges amounted to a violation of securities law. The SEC contends that this question warrants the intervention of an appeals court, while Ripple has attempted to challenge the need for an appeal.
Judge Jed Rakoff, presiding over a separate case brought by the SEC, previously disagreed with Judge Torres’ ruling, underscoring the complexity and divergence of legal interpretations surrounding XRP. The SEC has cited Judge Rakoff’s differing judgment as part of its argument for an interlocutory appeal, allowing an appellate court to address certain legal questions while the case progresses in the original court.
The SEC’s filing states, “[Judge Rakoff] did reject this Court’s legal conclusion that the existence of ‘blind’ trading platform-based transactions precludes the application of Howey, as a matter of law, under virtually identical facts (sales of the crypto asset by the issuer to investors on a platform in blind bid/ask transactions).”
Should Judge Torres grant the SEC’s motion for a mid-case appeal, the case will enter the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, further complicating the already intricate legal battle. This development raises broader questions about regulatory clarity and the classification of digital assets in the rapidly evolving cryptocurrency space.
As this legal saga unfolds, it remains a focal point in the ongoing conversation about crypto regulations, leaving the crypto industry and investors eagerly awaiting further developments in the Ripple vs. SEC dispute.
Best Crypto Exchange for Everyone: